Re: Shouldn't the definition of maintainer-clean be changed?

2007-03-20 Thread Bruce Korb
Benoit Sigoure wrote: > Quoting Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Not knowing the guts of this, my only complaint has to do >> with the help text for ``--clean'' and the lack of consistency >> WRT ``-c'' being an acceptable alias for it. >> > > Yeah you're right, the message should be consiste

Re: Shouldn't the definition of maintainer-clean be changed?

2007-03-20 Thread Benoit Sigoure
Quoting Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Not knowing the guts of this, my only complaint has to do with the help text for ``--clean'' and the lack of consistency WRT ``-c'' being an acceptable alias for it. Yeah you're right, the message should be consistent in the different programs. What abo

Re: Shouldn't the definition of maintainer-clean be changed?

2007-03-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Benoit, Please limit followups to this message to *ONE* group only, except as noted below, for simplicity let's say as this is where things started off. I've already thrown out a couple of lists. * Benoit Sigoure wrote on Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:42:09PM CET: > > Here is a first patch pro

Re: Shouldn't the definition of maintainer-clean be changed?

2007-03-20 Thread Bruce Korb
Not knowing the guts of this, my only complaint has to do with the help text for ``--clean'' and the lack of consistency WRT ``-c'' being an acceptable alias for it. Benoit Sigoure wrote: > Index: autoconf/bin/autoconf.as > === > RCS