Re: renamed objects and other languages

2007-04-26 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello Florian, * Florian Briegel wrote on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:59:10AM CEST: > Am Montag, 23. April 2007 schrieb Benoit Sigoure: > > Is there any reason why you would not want to do this? > > Simplicity. > > aaa_SOURCES = foo.x > > is much more easy to handle [...] indeed. I believe you

Re: renamed objects and other languages

2007-04-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ drop automake-prs, please ] Hello, * Stepan Kasal wrote on Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:58:26AM CEST: > > indeed. I believe you have found a bug, and I believe it is > desirable to fix it. I agree. > Though I'm not able to write a patch right now, I can write down some > hints: perhaps they will

Sablotron and Autotools?

2007-04-26 Thread Robert J. Hansen
For a project I'm working on, I need a crossplatform XML inspector. GDOME2 is out because it doesn't work on OS X, so we're instead looking at Sablotron. Looking at the Autoconf Archive I don't see any m4 macros for Sablotron, nor does it come with a pkg-config file. What is the canonical

Re: Sablotron and Autotools?

2007-04-26 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 02:46:55PM -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > What is the canonical way to test for the existence of libsablot with > autoconf 2.60? well, this question shall better go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think you can use AC_CHECK_LIB to check for the library. Since GNU/Linux