Am Samstag, den 11.08.2007, 17:33 +0100 schrieb Noah Slater:
> > The reason for this is:
> > ChangeLog: often mostly a duplicate of svn/cvs logs, seldom really used
>
> I agree about ChangeLog - there is no reason to be using this any more.
There is. Changelogs are useful to follow the changes in
But again, I think we are drifting from the subject, I can try to
rephrase my request.
In "modern" projects ChangeLog, NEWS and TODO makes little sense, as
they have more advance methods for handling such. And by forcing them
to be "Foreign" gives a bad taste, as they then might not include
import
On 8/11/07, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think you misunderstanding me, it's the generation if the changelog
> > that will take too long time.
>
> Well, yes - what else could I have understood from:
>
> > That not an optimal option, as it's illogical to store those files in the
> >
> I think you misunderstanding me, it's the generation if the changelog
> that will take too long time.
Well, yes - what else could I have understood from:
> That not an optimal option, as it's illogical to store those files in the svn.
How long does it take to generate?
--
"Creativity can be
On 8/11/07, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That not an optimal option, as it's illogical to store those files in the
> > svn.
>
> Well don't store them in svn - use a bootstrap script to make them
> before running the autotools.
>
> Here is the bit from my ./bootstrap that does the mag
> That not an optimal option, as it's illogical to store those files in the svn.
Well don't store them in svn - use a bootstrap script to make them
before running the autotools.
Here is the bit from my ./bootstrap that does the magic:
get_svk_svn_directory () {
# Return the SVN repository d
On 8/11/07, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem I have with generating ChangeLog, is that it will be BIG,
> > for example, bmpx generate at the moment ChangeLog from svn log, and
> > it ends up to 2.6 MB.
>
> The common solution is to use:
>
> ChangeLog
> ChangeLog.1.gz
> ChangeL
> The problem I have with generating ChangeLog, is that it will be BIG,
> for example, bmpx generate at the moment ChangeLog from svn log, and
> it ends up to 2.6 MB.
The common solution is to use:
ChangeLog
ChangeLog.1.gz
ChangeLog.2.gz
On 8/11/07, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Noah Slater wrote:
> >
> > Of course most of us work on computers - because they make us more
> > efficient. How many emails have you sent this week - how long would
> > that have taken you with a pen and paper? (telephon
> Only projects overcome with sloth do not maintain a ChangeLog.
Why do something your self when the computer can do it for you?
That's what we invented these things for, right?
> Version control systems come and go and are often not accessible to
> everyone while the tarball may continue to exi
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, [UTF-8] Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
In plenty of projects I have encountered, the "gnu" strictness is
toostrict, but also, the "foreign" strictness is too little
sometimes.
Thus I suggest a new strictness, somewhere in between gnu and
foreign,lets call it "relaxed", it's simla
> The reason for this is:
> ChangeLog: often mostly a duplicate of svn/cvs logs, seldom really used
I agree about ChangeLog - there is no reason to be using this any more.
In plenty of projects I have encountered, the "gnu" strictness is too
strict, but also, the "foreign" strictness is too little sometimes.
Thus I suggest a new strictness, somewhere in between gnu and foreign,
lets call it "relaxed", it's simlar to 'gnu', but only following files
are required:
'INS
Updates..
On 8/11/07, NightStrike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/10/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * NightStrike wrote on Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 12:00:21AM CEST:
> > > On 8/9/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > * NightStrike wrote on Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 04:
On 8/10/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * NightStrike wrote on Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 12:00:21AM CEST:
> > On 8/9/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > * NightStrike wrote on Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 04:49:00PM CEST:
> > > >
>
> > Well, I don't want or need to do this exac
15 matches
Mail list logo
