On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, NightStrike wrote:
There is no special support, but there is no special impediment, either.
How would one go about doing it? in a nutshell..
It used to be that O'Reilly Media had some really good nutshell books,
including one on make, but this one seems to be all they of
> Does automake support building shared libraries without using libtool?
It's possible.
The reason folks use libtool is that libtool knows about how to make
shared libraries on *many* different systems, and it addresses the
shared library version issues.
For people who want to write code and let
On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:33, NightStrike wrote:
> > On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:23, NightStrike wrote:
>
> >> >> > Does automake support building shared libraries without using
> >> >> >l
On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:33, NightStrike wrote:
> On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:23, NightStrike wrote:
>> >> > Does automake support building shared libraries without using
>> >> >libtool?
>> > How would one go about doing it? in a nutshell..
>
On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:23, NightStrike wrote:
> > On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:11, NightStrike wrote:
> >> > Does automake support building shared libraries without using libtool?
> >>
>
On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:23, NightStrike wrote:
> On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:11, NightStrike wrote:
>> > Does automake support building shared libraries without using libtool?
>>
>> The question is: why?
>
> Hypothetical discussion on the tcl p
On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:11, NightStrike wrote:
> > Does automake support building shared libraries without using libtool?
>
> The question is: why?
Hypothetical discussion on the tcl project.
> There is no special support, but there is no s
On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:11, NightStrike wrote:
> Does automake support building shared libraries without using libtool?
The question is: why?
There is no special support, but there is no special impediment, either.
Cheers,
Ralf
Does automake support building shared libraries without using libtool?
Nitin Goyal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can I make use of variables in Makefile.am for automake primaries? I
> want to write Makefile.am as
>
> lib_LIBRARIES = $(PREFIX)mylib.$(LIBSUFFIX)
> libdir = ${prefix}/lib
> $(PREFIX)_mylib_$(LIBSUFFIX)_SOURCES = mylib.c
>
> I can not use libtools. Is there a w
Nitin Goyal wrote:
I can not use libtools. Is there a way, I can achieve this?
Use Bakefile, or cmake, or jam, or something else that really
understands Windowsisms. automake can be arm-twisted into supporting
native Windows builds, but it isn't happy doing it. I use Bakefile
myself; it l
Hi,
How can I make use of variables in Makefile.am for automake primaries? I
want to write Makefile.am as
lib_LIBRARIES = $(PREFIX)mylib.$(LIBSUFFIX)
libdir = ${prefix}/lib
$(PREFIX)_mylib_$(LIBSUFFIX)_SOURCES = mylib.c
I can not use libtools. Is there a way, I can achieve this?
Thanks & Regard
12 matches
Mail list logo