Re: Shared without libtool

2008-03-07 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, NightStrike wrote: There is no special support, but there is no special impediment, either. How would one go about doing it? in a nutshell.. It used to be that O'Reilly Media had some really good nutshell books, including one on make, but this one seems to be all they of

Re: Shared without libtool

2008-03-07 Thread Harlan Stenn
> Does automake support building shared libraries without using libtool? It's possible. The reason folks use libtool is that libtool knows about how to make shared libraries on *many* different systems, and it addresses the shared library version issues. For people who want to write code and let

Re: Shared without libtool

2008-03-07 Thread NightStrike
On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:33, NightStrike wrote: > > On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:23, NightStrike wrote: > > >> >> > Does automake support building shared libraries without using > >> >> >l

Re: Shared without libtool

2008-03-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:33, NightStrike wrote: > On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:23, NightStrike wrote: >> >> > Does automake support building shared libraries without using >> >> >libtool? >> > How would one go about doing it? in a nutshell.. >

Re: Shared without libtool

2008-03-07 Thread NightStrike
On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:23, NightStrike wrote: > > On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:11, NightStrike wrote: > >> > Does automake support building shared libraries without using libtool? > >> >

Re: Shared without libtool

2008-03-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:23, NightStrike wrote: > On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:11, NightStrike wrote: >> > Does automake support building shared libraries without using libtool? >> >> The question is: why? > > Hypothetical discussion on the tcl p

Re: Shared without libtool

2008-03-07 Thread NightStrike
On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:11, NightStrike wrote: > > Does automake support building shared libraries without using libtool? > > The question is: why? Hypothetical discussion on the tcl project. > There is no special support, but there is no s

Re: Shared without libtool

2008-03-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:11, NightStrike wrote: > Does automake support building shared libraries without using libtool? The question is: why? There is no special support, but there is no special impediment, either. Cheers, Ralf

Shared without libtool

2008-03-07 Thread NightStrike
Does automake support building shared libraries without using libtool?

Re: Makefile.am for both windows and linux

2008-03-07 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Nitin Goyal wrote: > Hi, > > How can I make use of variables in Makefile.am for automake primaries? I > want to write Makefile.am as > > lib_LIBRARIES = $(PREFIX)mylib.$(LIBSUFFIX) > libdir = ${prefix}/lib > $(PREFIX)_mylib_$(LIBSUFFIX)_SOURCES = mylib.c > > I can not use libtools. Is there a w

Re: Makefile.am for both windows and linux

2008-03-07 Thread Warren Young
Nitin Goyal wrote: I can not use libtools. Is there a way, I can achieve this? Use Bakefile, or cmake, or jam, or something else that really understands Windowsisms. automake can be arm-twisted into supporting native Windows builds, but it isn't happy doing it. I use Bakefile myself; it l

Makefile.am for both windows and linux

2008-03-07 Thread Nitin Goyal
Hi, How can I make use of variables in Makefile.am for automake primaries? I want to write Makefile.am as lib_LIBRARIES = $(PREFIX)mylib.$(LIBSUFFIX) libdir = ${prefix}/lib $(PREFIX)_mylib_$(LIBSUFFIX)_SOURCES = mylib.c I can not use libtools. Is there a way, I can achieve this? Thanks & Regard