Hello John,
* John Calcote wrote on Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 07:07:56PM CET:
> Sorry for the list spam,
No problem, but could we continue this discussion on one list only,
say, the autoconf one, for lack of a better choice? Thanks.
Reply-To and Mail-Followup-To set.
> http://www.freesoftwaremagazin
Sorry for the list spam, but I thought people on this list might be
interested in a new book on using the GNU Autotools, called
Autotools: A Practitioner's Guide to Autoconf, Automake and Libtool
You can find it at free software magazine (freesoftwaremagazine.com):
http://www.freesoftwaremagazin
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Bernd Jendrissek <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 7:27 AM, John Calcote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > Thanks, but the problem with this solution is that I would have to
> > > rerun the .configure step each time. Forgetting to do that is
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 7:27 AM, John Calcote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks, but the problem with this solution is that I would have to
> > rerun the .configure step each time. Forgetting to do that is as as
> > easy as forgetting to edit the spec file.
How do you know that you've commi
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> noinst_PROGRAMS = poll.spec
> poll_tmpl_SOURCES = poll.tmpl FORCE
> .tmpl.spec:
> ./logpoll.pl $<
>
> FORCE:
[snip]
> Can anyone suggest how I might accomplish what I thought was going to be
> a simple task?
Why not ju
