Peter Johansson wrote:
I use the following snippet in one my projects:
AC_ARG_ENABLE(debug,
[AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-debug],[turn on debug options and code])],
[SD_CXXFLAGS="$SD_CXXFLAGS -g -O"],
[SD_CPPFLAGS="-DNDEBUG" SD_CXXFLAGS="$SD_CXXFLAGS -O3"])
FWIW, as a user I find this se
Hi Ben,
* Ben Pfaff wrote on Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:51:14PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'd really hate to invade make's namespace. They may come up with this
> > really cool new makefile variable, and we can't use it then. :-/
>
> I wonder whether this is a real
John Richetta wrote:
(I'm an autotools newbie.)
What is the automake sanctioned way of providing different top-level
make targets, that build my application with different options?
For example, say I want to build foo_nondebug, and foo_debug, and
(luckily) all of my application code resides
John Richetta wrote:
> clumsier for the maintainer. But I am sure automake must provide
> some way of achieving functionality equivalent to this essential make
> capability - no?
The automake way of doing this is with separate build directories, not
by hard coding any special rules into the buil
Peter,
On Sep 24, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Peter Johansson wrote:
John Richetta wrote:
(I'm an autotools newbie.)
What is the automake sanctioned way of providing different top-
level make targets, that build my application with different options?
For example, say I want to build foo_nondebug, a
(I'm an autotools newbie.)
What is the automake sanctioned way of providing different top-level
make targets, that build my application with different options?
For example, say I want to build foo_nondebug, and foo_debug, and
(luckily) all of my application code resides in the subdirectorie
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Akim Demaille wrote on Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 04:35:50PM CEST:
>>
>> I'm slowly getting rid of my recursive Makefiles. Instead I have one
>> local.mk per directory, and a few Makefile.ams that include them. Of
>> course I have to prefix all my fi
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 06:54:50 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Bryan Bennetts wrote on Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 05:01:21PM CEST:
> > > > If I do include the aclocal.m4, the configure *still* kicks off
> > > > automake because of a subdirs file that is created by configure being
> > > > newer than t
Le 23 sept. 08 à 23:08, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
Hi Akim,
Hi Ralf!
* Akim Demaille wrote on Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 04:35:50PM CEST:
I'm slowly getting rid of my recursive Makefiles. Instead I have one
local.mk per directory, and a few Makefile.ams that include them. Of
course I have to p
