Re: automake less verbose (iter 3)

2008-12-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* William Pursell wrote on Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:32:02AM CET: > Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > third round here of the automake-tranquility patch from me. > > Updates from previous attempts: > > I've been looking through the archive and haven't > noticed any followup on this. Yes, I will probably

Re: automake less verbose (iter 3)

2008-12-14 Thread William Pursell
Jan Engelhardt wrote: > third round here of the automake-tranquility patch from me. > Updates from previous attempts: I've been looking through the archive and haven't noticed any followup on this. I don't know if it counts for anything but I would certainly like to see this incorporated. Jan,

Re: Bigger picture of automake variables

2008-12-14 Thread LCID Fire
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Elsewhere, flags like AM_LDFLAGS are denoted as global. In that case, > it is meant to say that, unlike program_LDFLAGS, which applies to > 'program' only, the flags apply to all binaries created by this > Makefile.am (that themselves don't have per-target flags which over

Re: Bigger picture of automake variables

2008-12-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello, * LCID Fire wrote on Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 01:58:48AM CET: > I'm still pretty confused how the automake variables work. Perhaps > someone could answer my questions. > 1. I get it that they are just existing per Makfile in one directory. Right. Everything inside one Makefile.am typically on