[ adding bug-automake ]
Hello Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:03:31PM CEST:
> 'mostlyclean' cleans all files that are created by "make", except those
> that people normally want to keep. It's the target people are meant to
> invoke when they see "There's too much clutter in
Hello Reuben,
* Reuben Thomas wrote on Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:53:32PM CEST:
> I need an order-only prerequisite, but I don't want to assume GNU make.
> What should I do?
> The obvious way around this is the (somewhat annoying) one of putting the
> man page in a separate directory, and using SU
Hello,
* acprdoer wrote on Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:30:45AM CEST:
>
> Hi, thanks for the answer.
> I've tried removing the verifierCoherence.c and put the verifierCoherence.pc
> in the verifierCarte_SOURCES but the Makefile.in isnt generated :
>
> automake: reading COHERENCE/Makefile.am
> automa
On 4/2/2009 3:45 PM, Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
After trying so many options related to libraries I am exhausted.
I have a simple program that needs to link with a shared library installed
in /usr/local/lib.
When using my own simple Makefile and simply adding "-lproject -lm" everything
works fine
Gerald,
On 4/2/2009 3:45 PM, Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
After trying so many options related to libraries I am exhausted.
I have a simple program that needs to link with a shared library installed
in /usr/local/lib.
When using my own simple Makefile and simply adding "-lproject -lm" everything
w
Hello Gerald,
Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
After trying so many options related to libraries I am exhausted.
I have a simple program that needs to link with a shared library installed
in /usr/local/lib.
When using my own simple Makefile and simply adding "-lproject -lm" everything
works fine (l
After trying so many options related to libraries I am exhausted.
I have a simple program that needs to link with a shared library installed
in /usr/local/lib.
When using my own simple Makefile and simply adding "-lproject -lm" everything
works fine (libproject is the shared library).
But rega
On Thursday 2009-04-02 04:01, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>One of Ralf's concerns is that you can't do AC_SUBST([V], [1]), because it
>interacts badly with various make implementations. That is, the Makefile
>must not pre-define V as the only means of setting the package's default,
>if it cannot be overr
