Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de writes:
Does cscope offer enough additional functionality over, say,
Exuberant Ctags or gtags, to warrant being supported? Do many people
use it?
The most useful feature of cscope that is not in *tags (as far as
I know) is that it maintains a list of
Hi Debarshi,
* Debarshi Ray wrote on Thu, May 07, 2009 at 11:51:52AM CEST:
I found a discussion involving Jesse Barnes
(http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2004-07/msg00051.html) which
seemed inconclusive. I have tried this patch with Automake 1.10.2 and
the msmtp source base and it
Updated patch:
http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnu/0001-New-target-to-generate-cscope-database.patch
and inlined below.
Changes:
+ Removed the -R being passed to cscope. It does, indeed, cause files
not owned by the project to be indexed. (Ralf)
+ Added cscope to AM_RECURSIVE_TARGETS. Should it be
configure switches to cross-compiling mode if I call it with build !=
host like in
./configure --build=powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
--host=powerpc-bgp-linux-gnu CC=bgxlc
Can someone explain to me what implications that has for configure
checks and the build in general? I can see that configure
Consider following cross-compile scenario where I want to build programs
and libraries for the host (backend) as well as for the build
(frontend). There are programs/libraries that should be build for the
frontend only, for the backend only and for the frontend as well as for
the backend. I issue
Consider following cross-compile scenario where I want to build programs
and libraries for the host (backend) as well as for the build
(frontend). There are programs/libraries that should be build for the
frontend only, for the backend only and for the frontend as well as for
the backend. I issue
Hi Christian,
* Christian Rössel wrote on Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:14:34PM CEST:
Consider following cross-compile scenario where I want to build programs
and libraries for the host (backend) as well as for the build
(frontend). There are programs/libraries that should be build for the
frontend
On Friday 2009-05-08 06:23, Adam Mercer wrote:
I have noticed some strange behaviour with the build system on a
project I am working on, consider the following:
$ ./configure --prefix=/path/1
$ make
$ make install
$ ./configure --prefix=/path/2
$ make
$ make install
I would expect the make
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 23:52, Jan Engelhardt jeng...@medozas.de wrote:
Well, automake (unfortunately?) does not currently issue a recompile
when the compiler command changed.
It would be really cool to have that, though.
Thanks, I was worrying I'd done something wrong in my setup.
Cheers
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 06:52 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Well, automake (unfortunately?) does not currently issue a recompile
when the compiler command changed.
It would be really cool to have that, though.
Write the compiler command to a file (stamp-compiler). make things
depend on that
10 matches
Mail list logo
