On 9/28/2009 7:09 PM, John Calcote wrote:
Bruce,
On 9/28/2009 7:03 PM, David Bruce wrote:
Sorry David, then I went and got your first and last names mixed up.
Perhaps I'd better just be quiet now. ;)
Bruce,
On 9/28/2009 7:03 PM, David Bruce wrote:
Hello Ralf,
I found it! It was an utterly perversely subtle typographical error:
In my src/Makefile.am:
tuxmathserver_SOURCES = servermain.c\
server.c \
mathcards.c \
throttle.c \
Hello Ralf,
I found it! It was an utterly perversely subtle typographical error:
In my src/Makefile.am:
tuxmathserver_SOURCES = servermain.c\
server.c \
mathcards.c \
throttle.c \
. options.c
^
|
|
A
Hello Ralf,
> Which Autoconf and Automake versions do you use?
dbr...@penguinmaster:~/tuxmath-1.7.3$ automake --version
automake (GNU automake) 1.11
dbr...@penguinmaster:~/tuxmath-1.7.3$ autoconf --version
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.64
(my usual development machine is Debian Sid)
...intervening
* David Bruce wrote on Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 01:08:58AM CEST:
> On 9/27/09, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * David Bruce wrote on Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 04:51:01AM CEST:
> >> My project is not creating valid tarballs with "make dist", and "make
> >> distcheck" fails at the VPATH build stage.
> >
> > Pleas
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 08:56 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> You're much better off arguing that packages update to Autoconf 2.64,
> in many cases the configure script will shrink by more than 15K over
> the one generated by 2.63 (and it'll be a bit faster, too).
Nice! - and I think they should
