* Steffen Dettmer wrote on Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:53:56AM CEST:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Ralf Wildenhues
> wrote:
> > > would it be a potential possibility instead to `overwrite and
> > > specialize' some macro?
> >
> > With "some macro", you mean "some prepended or appended makefile.a
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 9:46 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 9:43 PM, NightStrike wrote:
>> Would it be out of the question to teach automake how to handle a def
>> file as a source file for a library? On windows platforms, we
>> typically do something like this after building t
Why doesn't automake have dependency tracking for preprocessed Fortran?
Wouldn't the following work? Note that there is a space before include so that
automake doesn't process it, but rather it appears verbatim in the generated
Makefile.in.
F77DEPMODE = makedepend
.F.o:
$(AM_V_PPF77) \
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > would it be a potential possibility instead to `overwrite and
> > specialize' some macro?
>
> With "some macro", you mean "some prepended or appended makefile.am
> snippet" here, right?
>
> Well, my idea of the above would be that if you
