Hello Ralf,
On 01.08.2010 19:16, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Rainer,
* Rainer Tammer wrote on Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 02:34:45PM CEST:
I just tested automake-1.11.1 on AIX V7BETA.
All make check tests succeed but two. Here are the two failures.
I have also attached the complete test-suit.log.
Hello Ralf.
At Sunday 01 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Somebody suggested to me (was that you, Ludo?) that Automake should
really allow the user to easily add recursive targets.
This is fairly trivial to implement, the biggest complication is
name calling.
So, here's the deal:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
am_RECURSIVE_TARGETS
am_RECURSIVE_CLEAN_TARGETS
am_ALL_RECURSIVE_TARGETS
I am not using these in my own makefiles, but perhaps someone else might be.
If there is reason to believe that these variables might currently be used,
then there is
At Monday 02 August 2010, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
am_RECURSIVE_TARGETS
am_RECURSIVE_CLEAN_TARGETS
am_ALL_RECURSIVE_TARGETS
I am not using these in my own makefiles, but perhaps someone
else might be. If there is reason to believe that
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
My experience has been that the target names are the biggest chore with a
non-recursive build since it is common to place targets in the same
directory level as the source code. Providing a short-hand which
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:10:10PM CEST:
At Sunday 01 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
So, here's the deal: currently, Automake has
RECURSIVE_TARGETS
RECURSIVE_CLEAN_TARGETS
AM_RECURSIVE_TARGETS
Is there any good reason (apart from naybe
At Monday 02 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:10:10PM CEST:
At Sunday 01 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
So, here's the deal: currently, Automake has
RECURSIVE_TARGETS
RECURSIVE_CLEAN_TARGETS
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 09:25:46PM CEST:
At Monday 02 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Also, I'd like to have a way to specify a recursive targers which
should recurse in a limited set of a projects' subdirectories,
and not in all of $(SUBDIRS). Do you
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
What about taking a cue from nobase_FOOS and having
prefixed_nobase1_dist_SOURCES =
perl/Foo/Bar.pm \
perl/Foo/Baz.pm
I'm deliberately conflating another issue: the all-or-nothing nature
of nobase_FOOS. In some source trees, it forces you to have
At Monday 02 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
But would it still recurse in that directory's subdirectories?
Yes.
If yes,
everything's fine with your approach (even if we could then IMHO
find a better naming than `*-am' for recusrive rules, but this
is a minor point).
Why,
10 matches
Mail list logo
