Hmpf. I attached the old patch by mistake, instead of a the new one.
What a dope. Hopefully I got it right this time.
Again, sorry for the noise.
Stefano
From 7c44c1df66d4fc5ed3e3978ae95bc0db99f7582c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 12
Hi Ralf,
Thank you a lot for the willingness to integrate the handling of PO and POT
files into Automake (first proposed in 2003:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2003-11/msg00047.html).
In order to test our common understanding, and to prepare for the unit tests,
here is a proposed patch
On 8/14/2010 7:09 PM, samson.pierre wrote:
Yes it works :-)
But I see a little warning when I call autoreconf :
`%'-style pattern rules are a GNU make extension
I think it is because I use this character ‘%’ in my rules. But this ‘%’ is
very interesting to define an implicit rules.
Is
() samson.pierre samson.pie...@laposte.net
() Sun, 15 Aug 2010 03:09:50 +0200 (CEST)
%.bmp: %.xcf
$(GIMP) -i -b '(xcf-bmp $ $@)' -b '(gimp-quit 0)'
Is there an equivalent or anything else which can help me to write this
rule avoiding this warning message?
I think here you can
* Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote on Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:02:21PM CEST:
Probably Automake manual (and its readers)
could benefit from changing the mysterious:
We do not discuss pattern rules here because they are not
portable, but they can be convenient in packages that assume GNU
`make'.
() Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de
() Sun, 15 Aug 2010 23:32:44 +0200
Yes, with a general example, please.
I am unsure what general example means, precisely, so
the patch below simply uses the one in The GNU Make Manual.
Is that ok?
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 23:32 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
# old fashioned suffix rule, portable
.xcf.bmp:
$(GIMP) -i -b '(xcf-bmp $ $@)' -b '(gimp-quit 0)'
Hey, maybe Automake hackers can riff off this thread in time for
the next release... (or, Would you like me to
