Hi Stefano,
you don't make it easy to catch up with you! :-O
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:54:52PM CEST:
* tests/remake0.test: New test.
* tests/Makefile.am (TESTS): Updated.
OK with ...
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/remake0.test
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+# Make sure the
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:05:20PM CEST:
--- a/m4/init.m4
+++ b/m4/init.m4
@@ -70,10 +70,22 @@ _AM_IF_OPTION([no-define],,
# Some tools Automake needs.
AC_REQUIRE([AM_SANITY_CHECK])dnl
AC_REQUIRE([AC_ARG_PROGRAM])dnl
+dnl We pass the the $AUTOCONF and $AUTOM4TE
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:14:03PM CEST:
Applied to maint, merged in master and branch-1.11, and pushed.
FWIW, somehow you managed to apply these two patches separately to each
of these branches, instead of merging them all from maint.
I'm fixing the merges with the
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:57:04PM CEST:
* tests/missing.test: Build and use our own `autoconf' script, to
avoid spurious failures due to configure-time value of $AUTOCONF
being an absolute path.
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:00:46PM CEST:
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
What is the actual problem by the way?
Basically, `missing --run /abs/path/to/autoconf' does not recognize
the program being run as an autoconf:
Why not adjust `missing'
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:00:46PM CEST:
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
What is the actual problem by the way?
Basically, `missing --run /abs/path/to/autoconf' does not
recognize
the
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:05:20PM CEST:
--- a/m4/init.m4
+++ b/m4/init.m4
@@ -70,10 +70,22 @@ _AM_IF_OPTION([no-define],,
# Some tools Automake needs.
AC_REQUIRE([AM_SANITY_CHECK])dnl
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:14:03PM CEST:
Applied to maint, merged in master and branch-1.11, and pushed.
FWIW, somehow you managed to apply these two patches separately to
each of these branches, instead of merging
Apologies for the slightly off-topic message, but the German wikipedia
entry for autotools contains a number of inaccuracies and bias against
it. I consider myself biased so I won't edit it, but would be delighted
to see someone setting things straight, trying to avoid bias.
If you have
So long ago already ...
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:26:14PM CEST:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Is there a way to make this quite a lot faster?
The LTLIBRARIES bits: yes, noted. The PROGRAMS bits should be
reasonably fast already, only forking a
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
So long ago already ...
Slow but sure ...
For some of the OSs the time is about the same if the directory is
already cleaned, while for others (e.g. OS-X) the time improves
considerably if the directory is already clean.
Here's a first patch I'm
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Apologies for the slightly off-topic message, but the German
wikipedia entry for autotools contains a number of inaccuracies
and bias against it.
FWIW, this is true also for the English wikipedia entry for autoconf
(but *not* for the automake
I am using Automake's simple test driver. I have three programs
that, due to a buggy program transformation, keep allocating
stack space until they segfault:
$ ulimit -s
8192
$ ./bug23
Segmentation fault
$ ./bug24
Segmentation fault
$ ./bug31
Segmentation fault
However:
$ make check
...
Hello Roberto,
* Roberto Bagnara wrote on Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:32:45PM CEST:
I am using Automake's simple test driver.
Are you using parallel-tests or not? Any setting for the variables
TESTS_ENVIRONMENT, LOG_COMPILER?
I have three programs
that, due to a buggy program transformation,
14 matches
Mail list logo
