Hi,
Whenever I move a C/C++ file from a directory to another (and update
Makefile.am), a subsequent 'make' fails because it is looking for the
file in the old place (the .Plo dependency file actually).
For exampling moving test1/Foo.c to test2/Foo.c results in this error:
make: *** No rule to
Hi Török,
thanks for the bug report.
* Török Edwin wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:11:44PM CET:
Whenever I move a C/C++ file from a directory to another (and update
Makefile.am), a subsequent 'make' fails because it is looking for the
file in the old place (the .Plo dependency file
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:42:05 +0100
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Török,
thanks for the bug report.
* Török Edwin wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:11:44PM CET:
Whenever I move a C/C++ file from a directory to another (and update
Makefile.am), a subsequent 'make' fails
* Török Edwin wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:10:56PM CET:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:42:05 +0100 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Török Edwin wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:11:44PM CET:
I think that:
- make clean should remove the dependency files if they're out of
date/wrong
That is
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:38:01 +0100
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
* Török Edwin wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:10:56PM CET:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:42:05 +0100 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Török Edwin wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:11:44PM CET:
I think that:
- make
On Thursday 11 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:37:23AM CET:
Well, the patch is almost just code reordering, with the very minor
exceptions that:
1. in the older version, some error messages could be printed before
`$me'
On Thursday 11 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On Wednesday 10 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:21:09PM CET:
* tests/defs.in ($top_testsbuilddir): New variable, initialized
with the value AC_SUBST'ed from
Hello automakers.
On Sunday 07 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Stefano Lattarini (7):
Tests defs: various reorderings, some improvements.
Tests defs: prefer $curdir over `pwd`.
Tests defs: rename $curdir - $testbuilddir
Tests defs: do not print message Running test $0
Pinging this patch again, following this:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-11/msg3.html
I'll wait the customary 72 hours (until sunday evening) before pushing.
Regards,
Stefano
Pinging this patch again, following this:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-11/msg3.html
I'll wait the customary 72 hours (until sunday evening) before pushing.
Regards,
Stefano
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 01:00:47PM CET:
On Thursday 11 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Thank for respinning. The patches are ok then, but I think you should
take care that the newly-introduced `pwd` is replaced by the variable
you later introduce for this
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:41:40PM CET:
On Sunday 07 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Stefano Lattarini (7):
Tests defs: various reorderings, some improvements.
Tests defs: prefer $curdir over `pwd`.
Tests defs: rename $curdir - $testbuilddir
On Thursday 11 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:52:06PM CET:
Tests defs: improve messages for skipped tests.
* tests/defs: Give meaningful messages about the reasons of a
test skip; this is especially useful as this file is run
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:10:39PM CET:
On Thursday 11 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:52:06PM CET:
@@ -228,11 +229,16 @@ do
(echo foo $priv_check_temp) /dev/null 21
overwrite_status=$?
On Thursday 11 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 09:10:39PM CET:
On Thursday 11 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:52:06PM CET:
@@ -228,11 +229,16 @@ do
(echo foo
On Monday 08 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Pinging this patch again, following this:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-11/msg3.html
There should be no need to rebase the patch (which is based off of maint),
so that I should just be able to merge it into
On Monday 08 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Pinging this patch again, following this:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-11/msg3.html
Merged to master, and pushed.
Regards,
Stefano
On Thursday 11 November 2010, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
Hi,
Hello Joost.
Sorry if I start my answer with criticism, but this subject ...
Two questions: warning: macro `AM_CPPFLAGS' not found in library
and how to assign values?
... already tells me that you should have presented your questions
Hi Stefano,
Thanks for you answer. You have solved all my Autotools problems for the
time being. So it helped.
--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Joost Kraaijeveld
Askesis B.V.
Molukkenstraat 14
6524NB Nijmegen
tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277
fax: 024-3608416
web: www.askesis.nl
signature.asc
Hello Pippijn,
* Pippijn van Steenhoven wrote on Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:11:20PM CET:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:56:52PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
[1] On some systems this is not true; e.g., GNU make evades the limit on
MSYS for this particular point, IIRC using a response file.
Can
The page here mentions the existence of AM_V_GEN:
http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/manual/automake/Options.html
But, form the perspective of an automake newbie, it doesn't do much more than
just mention that it's there.
I don't get from that page how to apply to all my $(CC) build commands,
21 matches
Mail list logo
