The subjects says it all, basically.
In section 3.3 The Uniform Naming Scheme I read:
``The current primary names are ‘PROGRAMS’, ‘LIBRARIES’, ‘LISP’,
‘PYTHON’, ‘JAVA’, ‘SCRIPTS’, ‘DATA’, ‘HEADERS’, ‘MANS’, and
‘TEXINFOS’. Some primaries also allow additional prefixes that
control
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
if COND
info_TEXINFOS = foo.texi
foo_TEXINFOS = bar.texi
nodist_info_TEXINFOS = generated.texi
endif
should work to generate and install foo.{info,pdf,...} only if COND,
but distribute foo.texi and bar.texi
[ no need to keep bug-automake@ in Cc:; debbugs takes care of that ]
Hello Jack,
* Jack Kelly wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:42:52PM CET:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Jack Kelly wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
if COND
info_TEXINFOS = foo.texi
Currently, the MANS primary accept *all* the standard automake
builtin prefix dirs (from lib and bin to pkglibexec and sysconf).
IMHO it should accept only man and man{1..9} (maybe doc? but I'd
rather say no).
Thanks,
Stefano
Hello Ralf and Behdad.
On Wednesday 17 November 2010, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On 11/13/10 03:00, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
You are the first person to report this in the 12 months since we
released fixed versions of Automake. I don't have other data to go on
but it thus doesn't seem to be a
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:52:10PM CET:
Currently, the TEXINFOS primary accept *all* the standard automake
builtin prefix dirs (from `lib' and `bin' to `pkglibexec' and
`sysconf').
IMHO it should accept only the `info' prefix (maybe also `doc'? but
I'd rather say
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:51:15PM CET:
Currently, the MANS primary accept *all* the standard automake
builtin prefix dirs (from lib and bin to pkglibexec and sysconf).
IMHO it should accept only man and man{1..9} (maybe doc? but I'd
rather say no).
This one is
I've now pushed the patch to master.
Regards,
Stefano
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 01:27:10AM CET:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
[ magic strings ]
Why all the variation in these? That makes the tests harder to read.
I'd rather not change the
I've now pushed the patch to maint, and merged maint into master.
Regards,
Stefano
Pushed to master now.
Regards,
Stefano
Hello automakers.
Here it is one of the last (5 or 6) testsuite-only patches I have in
my repository.
Tested successfully:
- Debian GNU/Linux, system GNU make (3.81) bash (4.1), gcc 4.4.4,
libtool 2.2.6b, autoconf 2.68.
- Debian GNU/Linux, GNU make 3.79, dash (0.5.5.1), gcc 4.0.1,
I'm seeing this in master now:
../automake/tests/remake11.test:makefiles_am_list=`find . -name Makefile.am |
LC_ALL=C sort`
../automake/tests/remake11.test:makefiles_list=`echo $makefiles_am_list | sed
's/\.am$//'`
Do not run make in the above tests. Use $MAKE instead.
Makefile:1090: recipe
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/canon7.test
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+# Stress test on canonicalization.
[...]
+cat Makefile.am 'END'
+noinst_PROGRAMS = dummy_static dummy_dynamic ,foo-bar
+noinst_LIBRARIES = libb.az+baz.a
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 06:41:46PM CET:
Ping on this? Reference:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-09/msg00106.html
The updated patch is attached. I will push it in 72 hours (by tuesday
evening) unless there are objections.
--- /dev/null
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:16:25PM CET:
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
--- a/tests/canon7.test
+++ b/tests/canon7.test
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ dummy_dynamic_SOURCES = $(dummy_static_SOURCES)
dummy_static_LDADD = $(noinst_LIBRARIES)
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:54:05PM CET:
OK to apply to a temporary branch off of maint, and merge to master?
The patch is ok with nits addressed.
BTW, notice that I'm planning to further extend the Lex/Yacc tests
and make them more semantic, but that should be better
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:54:05PM CET:
OK to apply to a temporary branch off of maint, and merge to master?
The patch is ok with nits addressed.
I've addressed almost all of them, but I have a doubt about one
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:16:25PM CET:
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
--- a/tests/canon7.test
+++ b/tests/canon7.test
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ dummy_dynamic_SOURCES = $(dummy_static_SOURCES)
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:10:29PM CET:
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
BTW, notice that I'm planning to further extend the Lex/Yacc tests
and make them more semantic, but that should be better done in a
follow-up patch IMVHO.
If
FWIW, I've put up coverage data for one of the runs back then at
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/coverage/coverage.html.
Only the /tmp/automake and /tmp/build parts are interesting really.
The rest is from the 'libtool --help' part which was still broken
back then.
And yes, I guess a more
Severity: wishlist
Conditional _TEXINFOS files should be supported, i.e.,
if COND
info_TEXINFOS = foo.texi
foo_TEXINFOS = bar.texi
nodist_info_TEXINFOS = generated.texi
endif
should work to generate and install foo.{info,pdf,...} only if COND,
but distribute foo.texi and bar.texi always.
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:40:37PM CET:
In section 3.3 The Uniform Naming Scheme I read:
``The current primary names are ‘PROGRAMS’, ‘LIBRARIES’, ‘LISP’,
‘PYTHON’, ‘JAVA’, ‘SCRIPTS’, ‘DATA’, ‘HEADERS’,
23 matches
Mail list logo
