Hello Eve-Marie,
please do not top-post (writing your answer above what you refer to)
on these lists. Thank you.
* Eve-Marie Devaliere wrote on Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 07:55:49PM CET:
> AM_DEFAULT_SOURCE_EXT = .f90
> TESTS = forward/Example1_Simple/Example1_Simple \
> k_matrix/Example1_Simp
[adding automake]
On 01/28/2011 04:38 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you use $(FOO-BAR) in Makefile? It's not portable in POSIX [1]
Then let's get that addressed in POSIX! We're already in the middle of
getting POSIX to support ${var${v}} nested variable expansions, on the
same arguments
Thanks Ralph!
> 'make check' is the thing to use; see 'info Automake --index check'.
Yes I figured that out about 10 minutes before your email... ;-) I had
always run 'make test' so far
I ended up making it working with the following, I thought I would post
it in case it can help someone else.
* Eve-Marie Devaliere wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:29:31PM CET:
> TESTS = Example1_Simple
> check_PROGRAMS = Example1_Simple
> Example1_Simple_SOURCES = Example1_Simple.f90
> Example1_Simple_FCLAGS =
There's a typo here, should be _FCFLAGS not _FCLAGS.
> -I/home/pub/evemarie/projects/CRTM/aut
* Eric Blake wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 04:04:19PM CET:
> On 01/28/2011 04:38 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > Can you use $(FOO-BAR) in Makefile? It's not portable in POSIX [1]
>
> Then let's get that addressed in POSIX!
Thank you Eric for being thorough!
> We're already in the middle of
> gettin
[dropping bug-autoconf]
Hello Ralf.
I like the proposed change (assuming the testsuite still passes ;-)
But there's a minor mistake in your testsuite addition, and I also
have a couple small unrelated nits/suggestions ...
> new file mode 100755
> index 000..3ba803f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/t
