Hello everyone,
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 07:12:02PM CET:
> 2) Autotools should have a FAQ document.
I've done a brain dump now, here's a rough initial version:
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/faq/autotools-faq.html and
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/faq/autotools
Hi Russell,
* Russell Shaw wrote on Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:00:14AM CET:
> I'd ask more about how the internals of ./configure and autoconf works.
Can you formulate more specific questions?
> And questions on how to make bison get handled without being forced to
> mimic standard yacc.
I've adde
On 20/02/11 06:10, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Russell,
* Russell Shaw wrote on Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:00:14AM CET:
I'd ask more about how the internals of ./configure and autoconf works.
Can you formulate more specific questions?
And questions on how to make bison get handled without being
Hi Vincent,
* Vincent Torri wrote on Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 08:33:01AM CET:
> from the automake documentation, all the files read by AC_CONFIG_FILES are
> added in the distribution. But why aren't the generated files not in the
> tarball (the .pc.in are in but not the .pc for example) ?
Just to ans
Hello Jeff,
* Daily, Jeff A wrote on Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:06:13AM CET:
> I wrote a profiling layer for my library utilizing weak symbols. I
> thought for starters it would be nice to profile some of my test
> programs, to make sure things are working okay. I'm using autoconf,
> automake, and
