On 02/22/2012 09:22 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>>
>> I don't understand how that patch could actually work ... If there are
>> too many tests in $(TESTS), there will be too many logs in $(TEST_LOGS),
>> and since the recipe for $(TEST_SUITE_LOG) con
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
I don't understand how that patch could actually work ... If there are
too many tests in $(TESTS), there will be too many logs in $(TEST_LOGS),
and since the recipe for $(TEST_SUITE_LOG) contents the expansion of
$(TEST_LOGS), the command line leng
On 02/22/2012 03:57 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
>> Hi Bob, sorry for the delay.
>>
>> On 02/19/2012 07:55 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>>> I am again bit by automake not being able run the test suite on systems
>>> with bounded command line length. U
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Hi Bob, sorry for the delay.
On 02/19/2012 07:55 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I am again bit by automake not being able run the test suite on systems
with bounded command line length. Up to automake 1.11.2 I was able to
apply a patch by Ralf Wildenh
Hi Bob, sorry for the delay.
On 02/19/2012 07:55 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> I am again bit by automake not being able run the test suite on systems
> with bounded command line length. Up to automake 1.11.2 I was able to
> apply a patch by Ralf Wildenhues.
>
Which patch are you referring to exac
