Congratulations on the new release.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
Bob Friesenhahn writes:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>> why are you using multiple convenience libraries? If you're not going
>> to install any of them, and the result is one final binary, you should
>> just list all the sources to that one target. This also helps if you
>> ch
I'm using automake 1.11.1 and autoconf 2.68. I am switching from a set
of hand-written Makefiles to autoconf/automake. I'm switching to
autotools since the support for cross-compilation is already there; my
hand-written Makefiles are getting hard to manage, and they don't
support VPATH builds
On 08/15/2012 03:16 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 15/08/2012 08:26, Del Merritt wrote:
nodist_EXTRA_libmyprog_la_SOURCES = dummy.cxx
I would bet that this one is giving you trouble, but...
I was using that on a hint from the automake manual:
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/ma
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
why are you using multiple convenience libraries? If you're not going to
install any of them, and the result is one final binary, you should just
list all the sources to that one target. This also helps if you change
some of the source files as it o
Hi Del,
First, if you're building a pure convenience library (you don't want shared
objects), then save yourself a layer of complexity by removing libtool from
the equation - just use LIBRARIES instead of LTLIBRARIES in your Makefile.am
file. Second, make sure all your relative paths are correct -
On 15/08/2012 08:26, Del Merritt wrote:
>
>nodist_EXTRA_libmyprog_la_SOURCES = dummy.cxx
I would bet that this one is giving you trouble, but...
why are you using multiple convenience libraries? If you're not going to
install any of them, and the result is one final binary, you should just
l
I'm using automake 1.11.1 and autoconf 2.68. I am switching from a set
of hand-written Makefiles to autoconf/automake. I'm switching to
autotools since the support for cross-compilation is already there; my
hand-written Makefiles are getting hard to manage, and they don't
support VPATH builds
On 08/15/12 08:45, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Miles Bader wrote:
(3) The final version info is updated (using VCS info and/or autoconf
version info) at make time using a script, and when it changes,
only causes a source file (e.g., version.c) to change.
This means tha
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Miles Bader wrote:
(3) The final version info is updated (using VCS info and/or autoconf
version info) at make time using a script, and when it changes,
only causes a source file (e.g., version.c) to change.
This means that although some things are rebuilt after a
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 06:57:02PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> AC_INIT(m4_esyscmd([scripts/pkginfo.sh package_name]),
> m4_esyscmd([scripts/pkginfo.sh package_version]),
> m4_esyscmd([scripts/pkginfo.sh package_bugreport]))
>
> Unfortunately, the values passed to AC_INIT are ca
11 matches
Mail list logo