On 07/02/2013 19:47, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> So you want to allow users to disable maintainer-mode rules in every
> package?
Yes. Where users here is "distribution packagers".
> Better risk an extra rebuild than to miss a required one IMVHO. Or
> understand why timestamps get mangled, and fix
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
The reason is that while it makes total sense for developers and users
alike, it's a pain for package maintainers, as sometimes timestamps end
up mangled by patches, and we get unexpected maintainer-mode rebuilds...
Better risk an extra rebuild tha
On 02/07/2013 06:17 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 16:18, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> (Side note: using AM_MAINTAINER_MODE these days is generally a bad idea
>> IMHO; we should find a way to deprecate its usage in documentation, and
>> eventually start warning at runtime if it is use
On 07/02/2013 16:18, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> (Side note: using AM_MAINTAINER_MODE these days is generally a bad idea
> IMHO; we should find a way to deprecate its usage in documentation, and
> eventually start warning at runtime if it is used -- and don't worry,
> with *no* plans for a later rem
Ciao,
this is somewhat a silly request... :-) I am a new user of
the parallel test harness; I have a project with a set of
tests that I want to run under different implementations of
the same language; I put all the tests in a library and then
load the library from test programs, one progr
On 2/7/13 7:58 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
On 02/05/2013 12:22 AM, Peter Johansson wrote:
On 02/04/2013 11:31 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
When I did this, I should really have published a 1.11.x release offering
this same option as well; that would have removed all confusion. Sigh,
such a l
On 02/07/2013 03:06 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> While working on my guide, I've noticed that there is an inconsistency
> with the way boolean parameters are passed.
>
> AM_MAINTAINER_MODE expects [enable] to be on-by-default.
>
(Side note: using AM_MAINTAINER_MODE these days is generally a bad
While working on my guide, I've noticed that there is an inconsistency
with the way boolean parameters are passed.
AM_MAINTAINER_MODE expects [enable] to be on-by-default.
AM_SILENT_RULES expects [yes] to be on-by-default.
Maybe it's something to keep in mind for future cleanups to accept both
fo
On 02/05/2013 12:22 AM, Peter Johansson wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 11:31 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> On 02/04/2013 01:16 AM, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> [CUT]
>>> Especially when the time between previous major releases was 2.5 years.
>>>
>>> Examining the Changelog and release dates:
>>>
[Aside: note th
Hi Diego.
On 02/07/2013 01:09 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 03/02/2013 20:28, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>
>> And note that support for INCLUDES has not been re-introduced in the
>> master branch yet, at the moment of writing; but we plan to definitely
>> do so before the next major release.
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
