On Mon, Sep 26, 2022, at 12:23 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
> Is anyone up for debugging some Python-related test failures on
> RHEL-based systems?
I have access to a RHEL7 system, I know Python, and this sounds much
less unpleasant than everything else I'm supposed to be doing today.
> I have a
This change ensures consistency and compatibility for both GNU Emacs
and XEmacs because:
* XEmacs doesn't support -Q and ignores it; and
* the different releases of GNU Emacs handle it differently, or not at
all.
With GNU Emacs, '-Q' was added in 22.1, and specifying it on earlier
versions
Hi Richard - I installed the -l bytecomp patch you sent (copied below).
It seems safe, and good in any case. Thanks.
If there are changes to make in the -Q / -q area, let's address those
separately. (I'll close this bug, I guess, but fine to keep discussing
wherever.) I don't think Automake uses
Emacs byte compilation now respects silent build rules (e.g. make V=0).
i.e. use AM_V_GEN to show this instead
GEN bar.elc
Thanks. I applied the patch.
Is anyone up for debugging some Python-related test failures on
RHEL-based systems?
Mike Vapier from gentoo made many improvements to the Python support.
(Mike, if you're still out there, would love to hear back.)
Unfortunately, the end result is that 13 tests (listed below) now fail
for me on
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022, at 5:45 AM, Richard Hopkins wrote:
> On 2022-09-23 16:15, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> Thank you for the patch. Are you able to test it with a version of
>> GNU Emacs older than 23.2? I see that you tested it with XEmacs 21,
>> but as I recall there were quite substantial