On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 19:46 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Bob Ham wrote on Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 01:24:06PM CEST:
> > DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -...@am__isrc@ -I$(top_builddir)
> >
> >
> > Why does this -I. exist? How can I remove it?
>
> See
> info Autom
ead of the system header.
--
Bob Ham
for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
c@ -I$(top_builddir)
Why does this -I. exist? How can I remove it?
--
Bob Ham
for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ody
> if we can fix compatibility issues before the release...)
Any idea when 1.7 will be released (roughly, obviously; I mean, months?
weeks? days?) I've got a build tree in a cvs that uses cvs automake.
It's waiting for 1.7 until it's committed :)
Bob
--
Bob Ham: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pkl.net/~node/
y the answer is: lobby for its removal :-),
> typically by criticizing it. One would hope another plausible
> approach would be to try to improve it...
Alternatively, could one not just use normal make rules in Makefile.am's
in order to get past automake's limitations?
--
Bob
e
> used, which are only true some of the time.
Umm.. why are you using it then?
--
Bob Ham: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pkl.net/~node/
mbase.lo
Am I doing something wrong, or is the SUFFIXES support not quite there
yet?
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Ham: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pkl.net/~node/
My music: http://mp3.com/obelisk_uk
GNU Hurd: http://hurd.gnu.org/
