disthook question and non-top level makefiles

Hi All, I am maintaining a project that has a non-top level makefile structure. Essentially, it separates the source files and their OS-dependent elements. src --projectA --projectB linux --projectA --projectB windows --projectA --projectB ...etc. The Makefile.am and configure.ac and other

Re: Help Requests

/// didier Le mar 09/12/2003 21:19, J. Scott Amort a crit : Thanks for the response! On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 08:05, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: i see from the previous post that you use a manual VPATH methodology. there are two approaches you can try: 1/ undo the unorthodoxy (move

Re: Help Requests

Thanks for the response! On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 08:05, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: i see from the previous post that you use a manual VPATH methodology. there are two approaches you can try: 1/ undo the unorthodoxy (move auto* files to top-level dir) 2/ prefix relative paths (such as ../../) w/

Re: Newbie Request for Help (make dist problem)

On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 09:27, Tom Tromey wrote: Yeah, you can do this. It's a bit more idiomatic to list header files in a _SOURCES somewhere. They are ignored for purposes of compilation, but are distributed. Thanks for the advice - I'll move the header files into the _SOURCES list. Best

Help Requests

Hi All, I posted a request for assistance a few days ago (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2003-12/msg00042.html), and although I realize this is a rather low volume list, I was hoping someone would have responded by now. Was it an inappropriate post or question? If so, could someone point

Newbie Request for Help (make dist problem)

Hello All, I am relatively new to the autoconf, automake, libtool tools, and am converting a project over to using them. I have a question relating to creating a proper Makefile.am to run a 'make dist' from, and although I have read through the online manuals numerous times, I can't quite figure