Infinite loop (ab)using the parallel test harness facility

2013-06-23 Thread Roberto Bagnara
, such as using LOG_COMPILER instead of TESTS_ENVIRONMENT, but these are orthogonal issue (i.e., the observation above is with an empty TESTS_ENVIRONMENT). -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Applied Formal Methods Laboratory - University of Parma, Italy mailto:bagn...@cs.unipr.it

Re: On Ubuntu 10.4, test programs that segfault do XPASS

2010-08-23 Thread Roberto Bagnara
, just released. Thanks again to everyone, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Applied Formal Methods Laboratory Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:bagn...@cs.unipr.it

Re: On Ubuntu 10.4, test programs that segfault do XPASS

2010-08-22 Thread Roberto Bagnara
On 08/22/10 06:11, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Roberto Bagnara wrote on Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:32:45PM CEST: I am using Automake's simple test driver. Are you using parallel-tests or not? I am not using it now (though I am planning to use it in the future). Any setting for the variables

Re: On Ubuntu 10.4, test programs that segfault do XPASS

2010-08-22 Thread Roberto Bagnara
On 08/22/10 12:09, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Roberto Bagnara wrote on Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 09:36:34AM CEST: On 08/22/10 06:11, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Roberto Bagnara wrote on Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:32:45PM CEST: I have three programs that, due to a buggy program transformation, keep

On Ubuntu 10.4, test programs that segfault do XPASS

2010-08-21 Thread Roberto Bagnara
) and they do. Any idea how I may investigate this issue further? Thanks, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Applied Formal Methods Laboratory Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:bagn...@cs.unipr.it

Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake simple tests

2010-08-19 Thread Roberto Bagnara
On 08/18/10 20:34, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 03:42:01PM CEST: On Wednesday 18 August 2010, Roberto Bagnara wrote: On 08/18/10 13:18, Stefano Lattarini wrote: At Wednesday 18 August 2010, Roberto Bagnara wrote: #$(TESTS:=...@objext

Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake simple tests

2010-08-18 Thread Roberto Bagnara
On 08/17/2010 08:47 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:26:13PM CEST: At Tuesday 17 August 2010, Roberto Bagnara wrote: On 08/17/10 13:26, Stefano Lattarini wrote: $(TESTS): your-special-purpose-compiler That dependency cases relinking

Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake simple tests

2010-08-18 Thread Roberto Bagnara
On 08/18/10 13:18, Stefano Lattarini wrote: At Wednesday 18 August 2010, Roberto Bagnara wrote: # This does not work: when ../../bin/compiler changes, tests are # not recompiled. # TESTS_OBJS = $(TESTS:=...@objext@) Typo here (and in Ralf example): should be $(TESTS:=...@objext@), with a dot

Testing a new compiler with Automake simple tests

2010-08-17 Thread Roberto Bagnara
are self-contained). How can I disably automatic dependency tracking *only* on that directory? Many thanks in advance, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Applied Formal Methods Laboratory Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:bagn

Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake simple tests

2010-08-17 Thread Roberto Bagnara
On 08/17/10 13:26, Stefano Lattarini wrote: At Tuesday 17 August 2010, Roberto Bagnara wrote: I would like to test a new special-purpose compiler (which is part of a bigger project) using the Automake simple tests feature. I have two problems: 1) I have not found a way to force recompilation

Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake simple tests

2010-08-17 Thread Roberto Bagnara
be seen as a documentation bug. Maybe I'll attempt a patch later or tomorrow. Yes, that would be a definite improvement. Thanks again, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Applied Formal Methods Laboratory Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara

Re: Problem with parallel builds

2010-04-19 Thread Roberto Bagnara
involuntary omissions in BUILT_SOURCES. As for the reason I was unable to reproduce the problem, it basically boils down to not getting enough rest. Embarrassing... sorry for bothering you and the mailing list about this. Many thanks again, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Applied Formal Methods

Problem with parallel builds

2010-04-18 Thread Roberto Bagnara
with this problem since yesterday to no avail: I am unable to reproduce it and to identify in the Automake manual what the cause might be. Many thanks in advance, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Applied Formal Methods Laboratory Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it

Generating Autotools files without autoreconf

2008-10-01 Thread Roberto Bagnara
invoking libtool, aclocal, automake in the right order and recursing to subdirectories is what is needed, but we are not sure. What is the right solution? All the best, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http

Re: [PPL-devel] Generating Autotools files without autoreconf

2008-10-01 Thread Roberto Bagnara
Andreas Schwab wrote: Roberto Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In other words, we would need something that acts like autoreconf except for the fact that it would not attempt to build configure from configure.ac. $ AUTOCONF=true autoreconf ... Hi Andreas, it would have been nice

Configure substitutions are not allowed in _SOURCES variables

2008-08-21 Thread Roberto Bagnara
enormous Makefile.am files which would be a maintenance nightmare. That is, now everything is automated; if we use a long chain of conditionals we would have to maintain consistency by hand. Is there any other possibility? All the best, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group

Re: [PPL-devel] Configure substitutions are not allowed in _SOURCES variables

2008-08-21 Thread Roberto Bagnara
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Roberto Bagnara wrote on Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:55:25PM CEST: [ ... lots of sources, conditional and all ... ] Using the solution outlined in the Automake manual (i.e., using conditionals) would cause us to write enormous Makefile.am files which would be a maintenance

Re: [PPL-devel] Configure substitutions are not allowed in _SOURCES variables

2008-08-21 Thread Roberto Bagnara
). Thanks a lot Ralf. I am not trying to complete that into something working. If you don't mind, I will let you know when I am done so that you can take a look. Cheers, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http

Problem with Libtool library and parallel builds

2007-08-30 Thread Roberto Bagnara
misusing Automake (1.10) and/or Libtool (1.5.22). Any idea? Thanks, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: automake/514: check_JAVA files are always compiled

2007-01-16 Thread Roberto Bagnara
Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hello! On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 07:35:35PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Roberto Bagnara wrote on Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 03:17:21PM CET: The subject says all. Is there any workaround? check_JAVA files are always compiled, not only in case of `make check'. Quoting 'info

In Automake 1.9.6 check_JAVA files are compiled before `make check'

2006-12-23 Thread Roberto Bagnara
The subject says all. Is there any workaround? All the best, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PPL-devel] Re: Doing something just a bit more complex than `make check'

2006-01-10 Thread Roberto Bagnara
@ redundant? * Roberto Bagnara wrote on Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 06:12:06PM CET: Autotest looks attractive. We may consider switching to it as soon as it stabilizes. The next Autoconf release should have a decently usable version of it. I look forward to it. Thanks again, Roberto -- Prof

Re: [PPL-devel] Re: Doing something just a bit more complex than `make check'

2006-01-07 Thread Roberto Bagnara
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello there, * Roberto Bagnara wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:13:16PM CEST: Instead, what I would like to have is to only say test1_SOURCES = test1.cc test2_SOURCES = test2.cc ... and then achieve the effect of (sorry for the pseudo-code) for flags

Doing something just a bit more complex than `make check'

2005-10-19 Thread Roberto Bagnara
by Automake? Many thanks in advance, Roberto P.S. Actually, it would be nice to also get rid of test1_SOURCES = test1.cc test2_SOURCES = test2.cc ... in favor of something more concise, but this is another story. -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group Department

Support for precompiled C++ headers

2004-11-28 Thread Roberto Bagnara
-- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Automake 1.8b uploaded (beta for Automake 1.9)

2004-05-23 Thread Roberto Bagnara
. The last thing I heard concerning this was reassuring: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2004-01/msg00212.html Has this project been dropped? (It would be a pity then.) All the best, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group Department of Mathematics, University of Parma

Inclusion of caml support into automake

2004-01-25 Thread Roberto Bagnara
capabilities. All the best, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]