On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 21:33 -0700, Andre Stechert wrote:
On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:55 PM, Ryan McDougall wrote:
However the problem remains that Im at a bit of a loss how to ship a
shared .SO library easily. If I build on my machine (or a set of
supported build machines) then the build
Hello,
First of all, Im only looking for serious answers, and I dont want to
start any flamewars, so Ill start out by saying that quite likely the
only problem here is my lack of knowledge of autotools, and the other
the issues involved. Please correct me at any point you disagree with.
After
and destdir them
at /tmp/staging. Then you can simply tar/gz the files at /tmp/
staging and ship
those to your customers. Or zip them.
Cheers,
Andre
On Oct 4, 2006, at 7:41 PM, Ryan McDougall wrote:
Hello,
First of all, Im only looking for serious answers, and I dont want
Hello,
I am porting a proprietary (yes I know, but it pays the bills) windows
application to linux using autotools. So far I have gotten automake to
do what I want up until the install/build stage.
I wish to provide our end-users with a tarball that includes a
dynamically linkable library, and
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 13:06 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Ryan,
* Ryan McDougall wrote on Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 11:30:32AM CEST:
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 18:23 +0900, Ryan McDougall wrote:
How can I either
1. Express to automake the correct dependancy
By writing
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 04:34 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Ryan McDougall wrote on Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:54:21AM CEST:
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 13:32 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Ryan McDougall wrote on Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:40:37AM CEST:
2) If you prefer nonrecursive makefiles (you
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 18:23 +0900, Ryan McDougall wrote:
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 04:34 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Ryan McDougall wrote on Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:54:21AM CEST:
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 13:32 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Ryan McDougall wrote on Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11
Hello,
I apologize if this has been answered somewhere. Ive read the book and
searched the archives.
My situation is this:
Im porting a large code-base from windows to linux, and attempting to
use autotools to do so. The code in SVN is essentially one big tree of
somewhat related modules --
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 13:32 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Ryan,
* Ryan McDougall wrote on Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:40:37AM CEST:
Im porting a large code-base from windows to linux, and attempting to
use autotools to do so. The code in SVN is essentially one big tree of
somewhat
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 13:32 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
The second approach will enable you to
make libA.la
in the toplevel directory. Otherwise, there is nothing that prevents
you from adding your own targets a la
A:
cd src/A $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) libA.la
.PHONY: A
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 04:34 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
You should keep in mind that the convenience archives will end up in
total (i.e., all their symbols, not just needed ones) in the resulting
module.
This is a good point, thank you. Do you have any more information
11 matches
Mail list logo
