Re: how to make _DEPENDENCIES appear earlier in prerequisite

2005-11-15 Thread n.g.
argument , independent to others. i used timestamp, but seems that i didn't notice something. `info Automake Multiple Outputs' is very helpful, thanks a lot. On 11/16/05, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * n.g. wrote on Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 11:46:07AM CET: it seems that if something

Re: compile not copied? Why?

2005-11-14 Thread n.g.
i have Makefile.am like this, and it didn't ask for `compile' script during `configure'. bin_PROGRAMS = test test_SOURCES = c.c cc.cc both sources is empty file. On 11/14/05, Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Harald, Please consider this thread:

Re: how to make _DEPENDENCIES appear earlier in prerequisite

2005-11-14 Thread n.g.
thanks very much. it seems that if something appeared in the same place in a Makefile, they are not ordered. ex. if they are both dependencies of a target. currently, the problem is solved by using BUILT_SOURCES and/or manual rules for sources. as you mentioned. if automake accept userdefined

Re: how to make _DEPENDENCIES appear earlier in prerequisite

2005-11-14 Thread n.g.
it seems that if something appeared in the same place in a Makefile, they are not ordered. ex. if they are both dependencies of a target. currently, the problem is solved by using BUILT_SOURCES and/or manual rules for sources. as you mentioned. if automake will accept userdefined rule to be

Re: compiling in the build time

2005-11-04 Thread n.g.
how about this ? : builddate.c: geoidx.c echo $date buildate.c On 11/4/05, David Byron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This feels like a faq, but I couldn't find anything related so here goes. I'd like to compile in the build time into my application. I have a recipe like this: