Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
However, I suspect I won't be able to adapt rules such as
%.lang.texinfo: $(top_srcdir)/tests/%.lang
will I?
You can try playing with VPATH. But note that Automake uses VPATH for
$(srcdir) so you may find it less error-prone to just put the %.lang
files in $(srcdir).
* Lorenzo Bettini wrote on Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:58:43PM CEST:
>>>
>>> SUFFIXES = .cc.html .cs.html .h.html
>>>
>>> .cs.cs.html:
>>> $(CSHARP2HTML) -i $< -o $@
>>
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> This is not a recognized suffix rule, you'll have to register the .cs
>> suffix manually.
>
> opps... I
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Lorenzo Bettini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Lorenzo,
* Lorenzo Bettini wrote on Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:18:48PM CEST:
and what if I need two files (with two different extensions) depend on
a single file?
That is not possible portably, i.e.,
Lorenzo Bettini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> Hello Lorenzo,
>>
>> * Lorenzo Bettini wrote on Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:18:48PM CEST:
>>> and what if I need two files (with two different extensions) depend on
>>> a single file?
>>
>> That is not possible portably, i.e., wit
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Lorenzo,
* Lorenzo Bettini wrote on Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:18:48PM CEST:
and what if I need two files (with two different extensions) depend on a
single file?
That is not possible portably, i.e., with inference rules. So either
you can just choose to rely on GNU
Hello Lorenzo,
* Lorenzo Bettini wrote on Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:18:48PM CEST:
>
> and what if I need two files (with two different extensions) depend on a
> single file?
That is not possible portably, i.e., with inference rules. So either
you can just choose to rely on GNU make, or write one
BeN [F1233 121D312] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
about rules of the shape, e.g.,
%.txt: %.tt
how else could I implement those make rules?
I guess so called old-fashioned style of implicit rules would do:
e.g:
.SUFFIXES: .txt .tt
all: t.txt
On Jul 26, 2007, at 2:42 PM, BeN [F1233 121D312] wrote:
Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
about rules of the shape, e.g.,
%.txt: %.tt
how else could I implement those make rules?
I guess so called old-fashioned style of implicit rules would do:
e.g:
.SUFFIXES: .txt .tt
all: t.txt
.tt.txt:
cp
Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
> after upgrading to automake 1.10 I get these warnings
>
> Makefile.am:47: `%'-style pattern rules are a GNU make extension
>
> about rules of the shape, e.g.,
>
> %.txt: %.tt
>
> how else could I implement those make rules?
The warnin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
>
> about rules of the shape, e.g.,
>
> %.txt: %.tt
>
> how else could I implement those make rules?
>
I guess so called old-fashioned style of implicit rules would do:
e.g:
.SUFFIXES: .txt .tt
all: t.txt
.tt.txt:
cp -v
Hi
after upgrading to automake 1.10 I get these warnings
Makefile.am:47: `%'-style pattern rules are a GNU make extension
about rules of the shape, e.g.,
%.txt: %.tt
how else could I implement those make rules?
thanks in advance
Lorenzo
--
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Sc
11 matches
Mail list logo