On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
By sufficiently noisy I mean that the user should be able to see the
preprocessor and library search paths and any defines provided via the
command line so they
chmod
...
rather than less-readable lines full of gcc command-line options.
From 9f39fa8559a8f87e1199f11f6cee295ac8cf6781 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering meyer...@redhat.com
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:48:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] build: use automake's --silent-rules option when
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Jim Meyering wrote:
I like automake's upcoming --silent-rules option enough
that I'm making it the default (when possible) for coreutils.
Since I bootstrap using automake from its next branch, it's
enabled for me. And that translates to enhanced Makefile.in
files in the
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de writes:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Since I bootstrap using automake from its next branch, it's
enabled for me. And that translates to enhanced Makefile.in
files in the tarballs I generate. The net result is that when
you run make (using distributed Makefile.in
