Re: [PATCH] etags support

2000-12-22 Thread Akim Demaille
Index: m4/init.m4 === RCS file: /cvs/automake/automake/m4/init.m4,v retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -r1.20 m4/init.m4 --- m4/init.m4 2000/10/10 00:18:52 1.20 +++ m4/init.m4 2000/12/21 18:07:02 @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ # some

Re: [PATCH] etags support

2000-12-22 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On 21 Dec 2000, Tom Tromey wrote: "Derek" == Derek R Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: creche. etags --version etags (GNU Emacs 20.5) Copyright (C) 1996 Free Software Foundation, Inc. and Ken Arnold This program is distributed under the same terms as Emacs It is pretty

Re: [PATCH] etags support

2000-12-22 Thread Derek R. Price
Tom Tromey wrote: "Derek" == Derek R Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hmm. I'm running RH 6.2 and /usr/bin/etags is the GNU version: I just looked into it and it looks like etags was distributed with the version of emacs (20.5) that was distributed with RedHat 6.2. They've removed it from

Re: [PATCH] etags support

2000-12-21 Thread Derek R. Price
Raja R Harinath wrote: I added a macro to test for the presence of etags and whether it supports "--etags-include=file" or "-i file" for includes. If Exuberent etags is supposed to be a drop-in replacement for Emacs etags, it should support the same options. Otherwise, it is a bug in

Re: [PATCH] etags support

2000-12-21 Thread Tom Tromey
"Derek" == Derek R Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Derek I added rudimentary support for different implementations of Derek etags (read the one Automake expects and Exuberent etags) since Derek they take slightly different options. Exuberent etags is the Derek version distributed with RedHat