Akim I do share your dislike for the structure, but please, note that
Akim we are defining methods per _object_. Cleaner would mean one
Akim *class* per language, which seems overkill to me.
Tom Really? Why? To me it seems natural.
Akim Yes, you are right. But we still have to face the
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 12:21:12AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 03:10:07PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
How hard is it going to be to move from the current object
implementation to the one we really want?
In short, reifying automake, I don't know. Reifying
"Akim" == akim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How hard is it going to be to move from the current object
implementation to the one we really want?
Akim You want me to read in dead animals bodies :)
Well, dead vegetables anyway.
Akim In short, reifying automake, I don't know. Reifying
"Akim" == Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Akim * automake.in: (Language): Add attribute `_finish'.
Akim (finish): New.
Akim (Automake): Adjust.
Akim (lang_header_finish, lang_yaccxx_finish, lang_lexxx_finish)
Akim (lang_asm_finish): Remove.
I'm not so sure about this patch.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:20:15PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
"Akim" == Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a mild dislike for this.
If `finish' were a method then we could simply inherit it.
I do share your dislike for the structure, but please, note that we are
defining methods
"Akim" == akim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a mild dislike for this.
If `finish' were a method then we could simply inherit it.
Akim I do share your dislike for the structure, but please, note that
Akim we are defining methods per _object_. Cleaner would mean one
Akim *class* per
Index: ChangeLog
from Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* automake.in: (Language): Add attribute `_finish'.
(finish): New.
(Automake): Adjust.
(lang_header_finish, lang_yaccxx_finish, lang_lexxx_finish)
(lang_asm_finish): Remove.
Index:
