Re: CCing list replies (was: Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or higher needed. Have au toconf 2.59 installed. What is/goes wrong?)

In this case I looked at the list of people in the discussion, knew they were all subscribed, and intentionally mailed only to the list. ;-) Andreas Schwab wrote: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This is not addressed at me, but I also had to learn the hard way > > that > > - some

Re: CCing list replies (was: Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or higher needed. Have au toconf 2.59 installed. What is/goes wrong?)

Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is not addressed at me, but I also had to learn the hard way > that > - some gnu.org lists but not all automatically exclude subscribers if > they are listed in To: or Cc:. This is customizable, see the mailman options page. Andreas. -- Andr

CCing list replies (was: Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or higher needed. Have au toconf 2.59 installed. What is/goes wrong?)

Hi Alexandre, * Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 01:15:31PM CET: > > PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not > understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the > reporter. We are all losers with this: you waste your time > writing an answ