Tim Van Holder wrote:
> Given that the "programs" are basically incarnations of a test script
> and not binary executables, would it make sense to use check_SCRIPTS
> instead of check_PROGRAMS?
Ignore this - it's early in the morning, just reread the message to find
the .test files are the scripts
Benoit Sigoure wrote:
> Hello
> My make distcheck fails on Windows because of the following:
>
> -
> check_PROGRAMS = \
> simple \
> xml-simple \
> parentness
Hello Benoit,
* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 11:32:05PM CET:
>
> TESTS = $(check_PROGRAMS:=.test)
[...]
> EXTRA_DIST = $(TESTS:.test=.stdout)
> -
>
> Automake automagically appends $EXEEXT (=.exe on Win32) to the
> check_
Hello
My make distcheck fails on Windows because of the following:
-
check_PROGRAMS = \
simple \
xml-simple \
parentness \
destroy
