John Calcote wrote:
I sure don't know what's happening to my email messages lately. This
is the third time this month that some response of mine has apparently
been completely lost by Google mail. I sent this response to this
thread last night (via Mozilla Thunderbird client), which goes
hand-
On Friday 03 April 2009 2:29:36 pm Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Gerald,
>
> * Gerald I. Evenden wrote on Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 08:11:22PM CEST:
> > One added note, that bothers me a little.
> >
> > If the system checks for an entry being present in a particular iibrary
> > by compiling/linking a t
On 4/3/2009 12:29 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Gerald,
* Gerald I. Evenden wrote on Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 08:11:22PM CEST:
One added note, that bothers me a little.
If the system checks for an entry being present in a particular iibrary by
compiling/linking a test program using the func
Hello Gerald,
* Gerald I. Evenden wrote on Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 08:11:22PM CEST:
> One added note, that bothers me a little.
>
> If the system checks for an entry being present in a particular iibrary by
> compiling/linking a test program using the function *and* linking to the
> specified libr
On Friday 03 April 2009 12:17:14 pm John Calcote wrote:
> On 4/3/2009 8:49 AM, Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 April 2009 5:56:52 pm Peter Johansson wrote:
> >> Hello Gerald,
> >>
> >> Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
> >>> After trying so many options related to libraries I am exhausted.
> >>>
On Friday 03 April 2009 12:17:14 pm John Calcote wrote:
> On 4/3/2009 8:49 AM, Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 April 2009 5:56:52 pm Peter Johansson wrote:
> >> Hello Gerald,
> >>
> >> Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
> >>> After trying so many options related to libraries I am exhausted.
> >>>
On Thursday 2009-04-02 23:45, Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
>After trying so many options related to libraries I am exhausted.
>
>I have a simple program that needs to link with a shared library installed
>in /usr/local/lib.
>
>When using my own simple Makefile and simply adding "-lproject -lm" every
On 4/3/2009 8:49 AM, Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
On Thursday 02 April 2009 5:56:52 pm Peter Johansson wrote:
Hello Gerald,
Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
After trying so many options related to libraries I am exhausted.
I have a simple program that needs to link with a shared library
install
On Thursday 02 April 2009 5:56:52 pm Peter Johansson wrote:
> Hello Gerald,
>
> Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
> > After trying so many options related to libraries I am exhausted.
> >
> > I have a simple program that needs to link with a shared library
> > installed in /usr/local/lib.
> >
> > When using
On 4/2/2009 3:45 PM, Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
After trying so many options related to libraries I am exhausted.
I have a simple program that needs to link with a shared library installed
in /usr/local/lib.
When using my own simple Makefile and simply adding "-lproject -lm" everything
works fine
Gerald,
On 4/2/2009 3:45 PM, Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
After trying so many options related to libraries I am exhausted.
I have a simple program that needs to link with a shared library installed
in /usr/local/lib.
When using my own simple Makefile and simply adding "-lproject -lm" everything
w
Hello Gerald,
Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
After trying so many options related to libraries I am exhausted.
I have a simple program that needs to link with a shared library installed
in /usr/local/lib.
When using my own simple Makefile and simply adding "-lproject -lm" everything
works fine (l
After trying so many options related to libraries I am exhausted.
I have a simple program that needs to link with a shared library installed
in /usr/local/lib.
When using my own simple Makefile and simply adding "-lproject -lm" everything
works fine (libproject is the shared library).
But rega
13 matches
Mail list logo
