[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the info. I really appreciate it. What is the easiest way
then to tell system to go to a different directory to build a dependency
if it is not built yet??
Either by having the SUBDIRS done in the right order as Alexandre
already mentioned, or adding
Assar == Assar Westerlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Assar bar/libbar.la:
Assar cd bar $(MAKE) libbar.la
Unless you declare this rule as PHONY (or list all the
dependencies of bar/libbar.la and the dependencies thereof) this
introduces a bug in the case the library already
and Autotools will update dependency list automatically from that???
Chris
Original Message
Subject: Re: Problems getting dependencies compiled before
executable
From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, June 14, 2003 12:19 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, if you don't mind me asking, what is the point of
_DEPENDENCIES when you can just add library to _LDADD
and Autotools will update dependency list automatically from that???
Usually, there's no point. However, there can be cases where
automake cannot
Chris == Chris Seberino [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Chris If a dependency of a target is not built, then Makefile
Chris should build the dependency first. That is not what
Chris is happening here. Why can't Makefile go to right
Chris directory to build the dependency???
[...]
Message
Subject: Re: Problems getting dependencies compiled before executable
From: Santosh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, June 11, 2003 10:12 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why not have the executable outside and the library
in a subdirectory. That is how I put my
Jun 10 10:51 main.c
-rw-rw-r--1 seberino seberino 202 Jun 10 11:07 Makefile.am
Thanks!
Chris
Original Message
Subject: Re: Problems getting dependencies compiled before executable
From: Assar Westerlund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, June 6
:51 main.c
-rw-rw-r--1 seberino seberino 202 Jun 10 11:07 Makefile.am
Thanks!
Chris
Original Message
Subject: Re: Problems getting dependencies compiled before executable
From: Assar Westerlund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, June 6, 2003 10:38 pm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would have preferred that build system would see
myprogram_DEPENDENCIES = libmylibrary.a
and automatically known to build library FIRST.
Why don't you use myprogram_LDADD = libmylibrary.a ?
I'm not able to reproduce your problem. Can you tell us what
I have multiple executables built from my source tree.
Some files in 1 directory are needed by many executables
so I made a library to link everwhere needed.
This one directory now must build this library and ALSO
the executable in that directory. It was a real struggle
to get library built
10 matches
Mail list logo
