Re: fast install released already?

2008-10-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Markus, Christopher, * Duft Markus wrote on Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 08:15:56AM CEST: > > > we currently use automake 1.9.6, and it would be best if > > > we don't have to touch any of our files (autoconf 2.59, libtool > > 1.5.24, > > > m4 1.4.4), is this possible? > > > > That's a bit tough.

Re: fast install released already?

2008-10-22 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
>From: Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Wow. It would be interesting to see how much faster things get with the >chances. Are the libraries all created with libtool? Because then I >guess they will end up being the remaining bottleneck (that would be >interesting to see, too). > >> If in

RE: fast install released already?

2008-10-21 Thread Duft Markus
> > Hello Markus, > > * Duft Markus wrote on Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:51:26AM CEST: > > > > I just wanted to ask wether the fast install bits are available > already > > in a released automake version? > > No, not yet. A few questions (unrelated to fast-install) have turned > out to be more work

Re: fast install released already?

2008-10-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Markus, * Duft Markus wrote on Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:51:26AM CEST: > > I just wanted to ask wether the fast install bits are available already > in a released automake version? No, not yet. A few questions (unrelated to fast-install) have turned out to be more work than expected, so the