On 2014-11-12
fr33domlover wrote:
>
> Here's part of my code:
>
> all-local: ref
>
> ref: ref-html
> ref-html: ref-full-html ref-api-html
> ref-full: ref-full-html
> ref-api: ref-api-html
> ref-full-html: $(reference_full_devhelp_chosen) \
>$(dist_reference_full_DATA)
> ref-api-
On 2014-11-12
Nick Bowler wrote:
> On 2014-11-12 21:58 +0200, fr33domlover wrote:
> > On 2014-11-12
> > Nick Bowler wrote:
> > > What is probably happening is that in VPATH builds from your tarball,
> > > your documentation is being rebuilt even though it was distributed.
> > > This is leaving f
On 2014-11-12 21:58 +0200, fr33domlover wrote:
> On 2014-11-12
> Nick Bowler wrote:
> > What is probably happening is that in VPATH builds from your tarball,
> > your documentation is being rebuilt even though it was distributed.
> > This is leaving files behind in your build directory, which dist
On 2014-11-12
Nick Bowler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2014-11-11 22:07 +0200, fr33domlover wrote:
> > On 2014-11-11
> > Simon Richter wrote:
> > > On 11.11.2014 18:50, fr33domlover wrote:
> > >
> > > > When I ran `make distcheck`, it failed because the HTML files don't get
> > > > cleaned by `make
On 2014-11-11
Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11.11.2014 22:02, fr33domlover wrote:
>
> >> If they are distributed, the distcheck target should not complain,
> >> because it should expect the files to be there.
>
> > The files are not specified in any variable with 'dist_' prefix. They are
>
Hello,
On 2014-11-11 22:07 +0200, fr33domlover wrote:
> On 2014-11-11
> Simon Richter wrote:
> > On 11.11.2014 18:50, fr33domlover wrote:
> >
> > > When I ran `make distcheck`, it failed because the HTML files don't get
> > > cleaned by `make distclean`. That makes sense, but specifically for my
Hi,
On 11.11.2014 22:02, fr33domlover wrote:
>> If they are distributed, the distcheck target should not complain,
>> because it should expect the files to be there.
> The files are not specified in any variable with 'dist_' prefix. They are
> distributed because I wrote a dist-hook. Normally I
On 2014-11-11
Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11.11.2014 21:07, fr33domlover wrote:
>
> >> When the files are distributed, the "distcheck" should recognize that
> >> these belong in the source package, and not show an error.
>
> > Hmmm I think I didn't make myself clear. So just to make sure
Hi,
On 11.11.2014 21:07, fr33domlover wrote:
>> When the files are distributed, the "distcheck" should recognize that
>> these belong in the source package, and not show an error.
> Hmmm I think I didn't make myself clear. So just to make sure, before I cause
> confusion: The files are indeed di
On 2014-11-11
Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11.11.2014 18:50, fr33domlover wrote:
>
> > When I ran `make distcheck`, it failed because the HTML files don't get
> > cleaned by `make distclean`. That makes sense, but specifically for my
> > package this is not an error.
>
> If you assume tha
Hi,
On 11.11.2014 18:50, fr33domlover wrote:
> When I ran `make distcheck`, it failed because the HTML files don't get
> cleaned
> by `make distclean`. That makes sense, but specifically for my package this is
> not an error.
If you assume that few people build these files, they should be
distr
Hello,
I have a package with code and a reference manual. The manual is rarely rebuilt
and requires several less usual tools (dot, doxygen, etc.) so I decided to put
the generated HTML files in MAINTAINERCLEANFILES and not DISTCLEANFILES.
When I ran `make distcheck`, it failed because the HTML fi
12 matches
Mail list logo
