Re: Status of non-recursive automake

2003-12-03 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, John Darrington wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 02:38:52PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > Does src1/foo.c exist? > > Yes. > > Are you using Automake 1.7.9? > > No. I was using 1.7.6 and it seemed that atl_SOURCES=src1/foo.c > works fine with this version. So presu

Re: Status of non-recursive automake

2003-12-03 Thread John Darrington
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 02:38:52PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: Does src1/foo.c exist? Yes. Are you using Automake 1.7.9? No. I was using 1.7.6 and it seemed that atl_SOURCES=src1/foo.c works fine with this version. So presumably the underscore thing was introduced between 1.

Re: Status of non-recursive automake

2003-12-02 Thread John Darrington
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 07:43:01PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: Based on my recent experience, non-recursive builds are working very well in the current automake release. Use 'subdir-objects' in AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS if you want the objects to be placed at the same relative locat

Re: Status of non-recursive automake

2003-12-02 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Darrington wrote: > Is non-recursive currently supported in automake or is it still in > development/ideas stage? If it's already working, what version do I > need, and what documentation exists? Based on my recent experience, non-recursive builds are working very well i