Re: VPATH elimination by configure

2001-01-22 Thread Derek R. Price
"Derek R. Price" wrote: > Akim Demaille wrote: > > > VPATH is just set to srcdir? So then, I'm in favor of Derek's patch > > which seems finer that the current one, and updating the Autoconf > > documentation to explain exactly what happens. > > Here's an even slightly better version. It will r

Re: VPATH elimination by configure

2001-01-22 Thread Derek R. Price
Akim Demaille wrote: > So, I think I'm slowly starting to understand this VPATH stuff: > configure wants to remove it only when useless, right? I.e., when > VPATH is just set to srcdir? So then, I'm in favor of Derek's patch > which seems finer that the current one, and updating the Autoconf >

Re: VPATH elimination by configure

2001-01-22 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> It seems to me that Autoconf's job is not to remove unportable Akim> code written by the user, so it seems wrong to have it remove Akim> VPATH definitions from Makefiles. Histori

Re: VPATH elimination by configure

2001-01-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> It seems to me that Autoconf's job is not to remove unportable Akim> code written by the user, so it seems wrong to have it remove Akim> VPATH definitions from Makefiles. Historically I'm sure it was Akim> useful, in a previous cent

Re: VPATH elimination by configure

2001-01-17 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 02:02:17PM +0100, Lars J. Aas wrote: : I'm all for this if the user can silence the warning by doing something : with a variable setting in the Makefile.am in case he knows what he is : doing. The same goes for all the automake warnings. If the warnings could be enumerate

Re: VPATH elimination by configure

2001-01-17 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:17:00AM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote: : It seems to me that Autoconf's job is not to remove unportable code : written by the user, so it seems wrong to have it remove VPATH : definitions from Makefiles. Historically I'm sure it was useful, in a : previous century, in a pr

VPATH elimination by configure

2001-01-17 Thread Akim Demaille
It seems to me that Autoconf's job is not to remove unportable code written by the user, so it seems wrong to have it remove VPATH definitions from Makefiles. Historically I'm sure it was useful, in a previous century, in a previous millennium. Today, I tend to think automake should *warn* when