Re: binary distribution build with automake

2009-05-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi William, * William Pursell wrote on Sun, May 10, 2009 at 09:09:23AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > You can just write one in your Makefile.am, as a plain 'make' rule. > > For reusability, you can also put it in a fragment file and include it > > in your Makefile.am. > > I have a "best prac

Re: binary distribution build with automake

2009-05-10 Thread William Pursell
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Andreas Otto wrote on Fri, May 08, 2009 at 01:28:16PM CEST: >> I missing one target in automake to create a binary distribution > > You can just write one in your Makefile.am, as a plain 'make' rule. > For reusability, you can also put it in a fragment file and include

Re: binary distribution build with automake

2009-05-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Andreas, * Andreas Otto wrote on Fri, May 08, 2009 at 01:28:16PM CEST: > I missing one target in automake to create a binary distribution > Reason: > > 1. the default prefix is "/usr/local" -> thats ok > 2. this prefix is required for libraray "rpath" feature -> thats ok >

binary distribution build with automake

2009-05-08 Thread Andreas Otto
Hi, I missing one target in automake to create a binary distribution Reason: 1. the default prefix is "/usr/local" -> thats ok 2. this prefix is required for libraray "rpath" feature -> thats ok 3. to buid and install a sw in "/usr/local" is a problem because it