On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 08:33 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> No, I don't, but automake/NEWS indicates that it should've been around
> 1.7, and 'git show Release-1-7:lib/am/distdir.am' looks good, too.
Thanks again,
Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
* Robert Collins wrote on Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 08:30:03AM CEST:
> On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 08:24 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Robert Collins wrote on Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:16:25AM CEST:
> > > It would be nice if there was an option to tell automake not to (do
> > > 'uninstall' as part of dist
Hello Robert,
* Robert Collins wrote on Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:16:25AM CEST:
> It would be nice if there was an option to tell automake not to (do
> 'uninstall' as part of distcheck | require that uninstall leaves no
> files behind)
You can do the latter by overriding either distuninstallcheck r
On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 08:24 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Robert,
>
> * Robert Collins wrote on Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:16:25AM CEST:
> > It would be nice if there was an option to tell automake not to (do
> > 'uninstall' as part of distcheck | require that uninstall leaves no
> > files be
It would be nice if there was an option to tell automake not to (do
'uninstall' as part of distcheck | require that uninstall leaves no
files behind)
distcheck is very useful, it catches many distribution related bugs like
missing EXTRA_DIST and so on.
However, uninstall as a target is much less
