Re: gnupload and ncftpput

2008-08-01 Thread Karl Berry
Just to resolve this ... I guess I'll just upload my ncftpput replacement script elsewhere. It's not worth any of our time to prolong the discussion. Thanks, k

Re: gnupload and ncftpput

2008-07-29 Thread Karl Berry
Not sure whether ftp is universally available, though. A lot more universally than ncftpput, I expect. If you want me to prepare a patch, I'll try. If you'd rather not bother with it, I'll just write about putting the replacement script into gnulib. I don't have strong feelings about it

Re: gnupload and ncftpput

2008-07-28 Thread Karl Berry
1) do you have any interest in eliminating the dependency on ncftpput? Sure. So perhaps the best outcome would be for gnupload to use ftp itself, instead of ncftpput? Ie, this stuff could become a function in gnupload? Failing that, perhaps gnupload could use a variable, e.g., :

Re: gnupload and ncftpput

2008-07-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Karl, * Karl Berry wrote on Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:30:52AM CEST: 1) do you have any interest in eliminating the dependency on ncftpput? Sure. So perhaps the best outcome would be for gnupload to use ftp itself, instead of ncftpput? Ie, this stuff could become a function in

gnupload and ncftpput

2008-07-27 Thread Karl Berry
Hi Ralf and everyone, I received a suggestion to mention gnupload in the GNU maintainers manual, since it's the easiest way (that I know of, anyway) to upload files to ftp.gnu.org and alpha.gnu.org. However, there is one issue I felt should be mentioned to do so: the dependency on ncftpput.

Re: gnupload and ncftpput

2008-07-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Karl, * Karl Berry wrote on Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 02:54:38AM CEST: So, I guess my questions are: 1) do you have any interest in eliminating the dependency on ncftpput? Sure. 2) do you have any interest in including this ncftpput-replacement somewhere, somehow? Fine with me. I suppose