Re: libfoo.la is already going to be installed in lib.

2002-09-22 Thread Harlan Stenn
> Harlan> This appears to be aproblem with libtool+automake; if I > Harlan> use a static library (no libtool) I don't see this > Harlan> problem. > > Unless I'm mistaken, you already submitted this one as PR automake/350. Could well be - things are hectic here. > Harlan> Is there a workarou

Re: libfoo.la is already going to be installed in lib.

2002-09-22 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Harlan> This appears to be aproblem with libtool+automake; if I Harlan> use a static library (no libtool) I don't see this Harlan> problem. Unless I'm mistaken, you already submitted this one as PR automake/350. Harlan> Is there a wor

libfoo.la is already going to be installed in lib.

2002-09-21 Thread Harlan Stenn
This appears to be aproblem with libtool+automake; if I use a static library (no libtool) I don't see this problem. Is there a workaround/bugfix? This problem means that autoreconf bails with an error... (Yes, I've tried a couple of other choices, like using a variable in the conditionals and s

Re: libfoo.la is already going to be installed in `lib'

2002-08-20 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Harlan> I hope I didn't ask about this one already. Harlan> I have a Makefile.am that uses conditionals: Harlan> foo/Makefile.am: Harlan> if COND1 Harlan> libfoo = libfoo.la Harlan> endif Harlan> if COND2 Harlan> libfoo = libfoo.l

libfoo.la is already going to be installed in `lib'

2002-08-19 Thread Harlan Stenn
le.am: `libfoo.la' is already going to be installed in `lib' twice. So how do I get automake to shut up? H