Re: no rule to make asm targets

2006-12-08 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:05:14PM +0200, Jari Strand wrote: I am sorry that I have to post again but I am still stuck with this problem. Was it so that the problem should have been fixed after changing the code to use the global target flags? I hope I have just done something wrong

Re: no rule to make asm targets

2006-12-06 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:21:09AM +0200, Jari Strand wrote: For example, does bin_PROGRAMS really contain only one program? Yes, [...] OK, in that case there is no need to use per-target flags. Let me show an example: bin_PROGRAMS = first second third first_SOURCES = first.c

Re: no rule to make asm targets

2006-12-06 Thread Jari Strand
Hello, From: Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jari Strand [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: automake@gnu.org Subject: Re: no rule to make asm targets Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 11:52:19 +0100 Hello, On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:21:09AM +0200, Jari Strand wrote: For example, does bin_PROGRAMS really contain

Re: no rule to make asm targets

2006-12-05 Thread Jari Strand
From: Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jari Strand [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: automake@gnu.org Subject: Re: no rule to make asm targets Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 07:32:34 +0100 * Jari Strand wrote on Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 04:03:01AM CET: From: Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please keep

Re: no rule to make asm targets

2006-12-05 Thread Jari Strand
Hi, From: Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jari Strand [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: automake@gnu.org Subject: Re: no rule to make asm targets Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 20:59:50 +0100 Hello, On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:28:28PM +0200, Jari Strand wrote: Ralf wrote: Generally, you could - avoid per

Re: no rule to make asm targets

2006-12-04 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Jari, Please keep the mailing list in Cc:. Thanks. * Jari Strand wrote on Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 02:09:10PM CET: From: Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Jari Strand wrote on Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 08:08:04PM CET: ..asm.o: This line should be (minus the indentation): .asm.o:

Re: no rule to make asm targets

2006-12-04 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 02:19:35PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: In a plain Makefile, you'd do that with this line: .SUFFIXES: .asm .o In a Makefile.am, you instead write this: SUFFIXES = .asm .o but it is not necessary in normal cases[*], Automake can deduce the suffixes from

Re: no rule to make asm targets

2006-12-04 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jari Strand wrote on Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 04:03:01AM CET: From: Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please keep the mailing list in Cc:. Thanks. I am sorry because I don't know what Cc means? It means that, when you reply, you should also send a copy of the message to the automake mailing

no rule to make asm targets

2006-12-03 Thread Jari Strand
Hi, I'm trying to add build option for asm files and I have done this succesfully before but there seems to be something wrong with my configuration at this time. This is what I have in configure.in: dnl Check for nasm AC_PATH_PROG(NASM_PATH, nasm, no) AC_SUBST(NASM_PATH) if test

Re: no rule to make asm targets

2006-12-03 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Jari, * Jari Strand wrote on Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 08:08:04PM CET: dnl Check for nasm AC_PATH_PROG(NASM_PATH, nasm, no) AC_SUBST(NASM_PATH) if test x$NASM_PATH = xno; then AC_MSG_WARN(Couldn't find nasm) HAVE_NASM=no else AC_DEFINE(HAVE_NASM, 1, [Define if NASM, the netwide