renamed objects and other languages

2007-04-22 Thread briegel
Hi there, I have a problem with renamed objects and other languages, like ZeroCs slice language and QTs user interface metalanguage. So when I try to compile a file from another language with the suffix .x, the following snippet works fine, --- snip SUFFIXES = .x .x.cc: %.cc %.h

Re: renamed objects and other languages

2007-04-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Florian, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 03:38:45PM CEST: > --- snip > SUFFIXES = .x > > .x.cc: > > %.cc %.h: %.x > :> $*.cc > :> $*.h > > bin_PROGRAMS = aaa > aaa_SOURCES = main.cc foo.x > --- snip > > as soon long I don't add: > >

Re: renamed objects and other languages

2007-04-22 Thread Benoit Sigoure
Quoting Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello Florian, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 03:38:45PM CEST: --- snip SUFFIXES = .x .x.cc: %.cc %.h: %.x :> $*.cc :> $*.h bin_PROGRAMS = aaa aaa_SOURCES = main.cc foo.x --- snip as soon lo

Re: renamed objects and other languages

2007-04-23 Thread Florian Briegel
Thanks, for the fast reply. I know that I can do it this way. But I really want to put only foo.x into aaa_SOURCES With the normal build it works perfect. But not with this automatic renaming thing, because automake puts this rule int the Makefile: aaa-foo.o: foo.x and in my op

Re: renamed objects and other languages

2007-04-23 Thread Benoit Sigoure
Quoting Florian Briegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello Florian, please avoid top-posting (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting) Thanks, for the fast reply. I know that I can do it this way. But I really want to put only foo.x into aaa_SOURCES Why? `foo.x' is not a direct source of `aaa'.

Re: renamed objects and other languages

2007-04-23 Thread Florian Briegel
Hello Benoit, Am Montag, 23. April 2007 schrieb Benoit Sigoure: > Quoting Florian Briegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hello Florian, > please avoid top-posting (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting) > > > Thanks, for the fast reply. I know that I can do it this way. > > > > But I really want to

Re: renamed objects and other languages

2007-04-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Florian Briegel wrote on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:59:10AM CEST: > Am Montag, 23. April 2007 schrieb Benoit Sigoure: > > > > Is there any reason why you would not want to do this? > > Simplicity. > > aaa_SOURCES = foo.x > > is much more easy to handle than this one > > BUILT_SOURCES = foo.c

Re: renamed objects and other languages

2007-04-26 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello Florian, * Florian Briegel wrote on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:59:10AM CEST: > Am Montag, 23. April 2007 schrieb Benoit Sigoure: > > Is there any reason why you would not want to do this? > > Simplicity. > > aaa_SOURCES = foo.x > > is much more easy to handle [...] indeed. I believe you

Re: renamed objects and other languages

2007-04-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ drop automake-prs, please ] Hello, * Stepan Kasal wrote on Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:58:26AM CEST: > > indeed. I believe you have found a bug, and I believe it is > desirable to fix it. I agree. > Though I'm not able to write a patch right now, I can write down some > hints: perhaps they will

Re: renamed objects and other languages

2007-05-01 Thread Florian Briegel at mpia-hd
Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2007 11:58:26 schrieb Stepan Kasal: > Hello Florian, > > * Florian Briegel wrote on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:59:10AM CEST: > > Am Montag, 23. April 2007 schrieb Benoit Sigoure: > > > Is there any reason why you would not want to do this? > > > > Simplicity. > > > > aaa_SOU