Re: rpm spec bad

2001-03-23 Thread Tom Tromey
> ">" == D Stimits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I suspect though that the answer requires altering the rpm spec's. >> Meaning the automake 1.4d rpm package maintainer, but I don't know >> who that is. We don't know either. Maybe the answer is in the spec file. Tom

Re: rpm spec bad

2001-03-15 Thread D. Stimits
Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On Mar 15, 2001, "D. Stimits" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm trying to do an rpm rebuild under the 1.4d automake, and came up > > with a failure that I can't figure out, other than it being a broken > > spec. > > I suppose you'd get better help about this proble

Re: rpm spec bad

2001-03-15 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Mar 15, 2001, "D. Stimits" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to do an rpm rebuild under the 1.4d automake, and came up > with a failure that I can't figure out, other than it being a broken > spec. I suppose you'd get better help about this problem in an RPM-specific forum. -- Alexand

rpm spec bad

2001-03-15 Thread D. Stimits
I'm trying to do an rpm rebuild under the 1.4d automake, and came up with a failure that I can't figure out, other than it being a broken spec. I have bash installed, which is the sh on my system. However, the rebuild breaks claiming there is no sh, when in reality there is (but the rpm that provi