On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 06:41, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > It is possible to set up moderation. Actually, moderation is a wrong
> > word. The only responsibility of the moderator show be preventing spam.
>
> I help moderate a few of the GNU lists which are moderated solely to
> prevent spam and I can
> It is possible to set up moderation. Actually, moderation is a wrong
> word. The only responsibility of the moderator show be preventing spam.
I help moderate a few of the GNU lists which are moderated solely to
prevent spam and I can tell you from personal experience that it is a
pain. Mai
> There is no point in debating about spam here, it becomes spam by
> itself.
Especially if you receive every e-mail twice...
Frank
Francis James Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's getting them wrong that is living, getting them wrong and wrong and
wrong and then, on careful reconsideration, gett
> "Rupert" == Rupert Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rupert> Lars J. Aas wrote:
>> : Why not close the list then? IMHO it's so easy and fast to join
>> the : list so that requiring that you are a member if you want to
>> post is : OK.
>>
>> I wouldn't mind this personally, but I seem to rem
Lars J. Aas wrote:
> : Why not close the list then? IMHO it's so easy and fast to join the
> : list so that requiring that you are a member if you want to post is
> : OK.
>
> I wouldn't mind this personally, but I seem to remember there were
> some strong opinions against this the last time it w
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:23:56AM +0100, Mats Lidell wrote:
: > Lars wrote:
: Lars> [...] it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that
: Lars> currently gets through without closing the list so only
: Lars> subscribers can post
:
: Why not close the list then? IMHO it's so easy and fa
> Lars wrote:
Lars> [...] it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that
Lars> currently gets through without closing the list so only
Lars> subscribers can post
Why not close the list then? IMHO it's so easy and fast to join the
list so that requiring that you are a member if you want
Have a look at `spamassassin', it works great. Look at the following
folder, last erased Jan 12th, which it made thanks to the following
bits of .procmailrc:
:0fw
| spamassassin -P
:0e
{
EXITCODE=$?
}
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Flag: YES
caughtspam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Get ready to see BIGGEST teen sit
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 08:10:25AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
: Hello!
:
: > We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering, but
: > it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that currently gets through
: > without closing the list so only subscribers can post or moderat
Hello!
> We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering, but
> it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that currently gets through
> without closing the list so only subscribers can post or moderating the
> postings from non-subscribers. Nobody is interested in the mo
> We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering
Thank you for that, at least.
> BTW, it's driving me nuts too, but I'm out of filtering ideas...
Allow only messages containing the line "Dear Automake,"? Maybe not.
Regards, Frank
Francis James Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:46:26AM +, F J Franklin wrote:
: Please do something about this deluge of spam! It's driving me nuts!
We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering, but
it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that currently gets through
without closing
Please do something about this deluge of spam! It's driving me nuts!
Sorely aggravated,
Frank
Francis James Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's getting them wrong that is living, getting them wrong and wrong and
wrong and then, on careful reconsideration, getting them wrong again.
That's how we kno
13 matches
Mail list logo
