Re: useful bug reports

2005-11-15 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi Ralf, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Harald, please consider *providing more and useful information* if you > want help. I for one can't read your mind, and almost every first post > of yours leaves me wanting for a crystal ball as to what has gone wrong. > This makes me for one be less and less

Re: useful bug reports

2005-11-15 Thread Harald Dunkel
PS: Sorry, I pasted the wrong Makefile.am into the EMail, see below. Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi Ralf, > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >>Harald, please consider *providing more and useful information* if you >>want help. I for one can't read your mind, and almost every first post >>of yours leaves m

Re: useful bug reports

2005-11-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Harald Dunkel wrote on Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 05:12:33PM CET: > > Here is a sample. *snip* Thank you! > Autoconf is 2.59, plus Stepan's patch for c.m4, see attachment > Automake is 1.9.6 > platform is Linux > build platform is Windows, using MSVC 7.1. OK. The installation of the `compile' scri

Re: useful bug reports

2005-11-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:46:45PM CET: > * Harald Dunkel wrote on Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 05:12:33PM CET: > > > > The patch provided by Stepan some months ago fixes > > AM_PROG_CC_C_O for Windows and MSVC, i.e. configure recognizes > > that -c -o doesn't work as expected for

Re: useful bug reports

2005-11-16 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi Ralf, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Erm. Before continuing on this road any further: have you tried using > cccl? It's a wrapper script for MSVC designed to do exactly what looks > like quite a bit of work inside the autotools. I'm not saying it can't > be done, or should not be done, but it h

autotools support for msvc (was: useful bug reports)

2005-11-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Harald, * Harald Dunkel wrote on Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 09:05:47AM CET: > > There might be yet another problem with supporting msvc: Bill's > libraries are not built by 'ar cru', either. AFAIK they have > to be built using link.exe, e.g. > > link.exe /lib /OUT:libmylib.lib foo.obj bar.obj

autotools support for msvc (was: useful bug reports)

2005-11-17 Thread Rob Byrne
Hi Ralf, Unfortunately, I haven't gotten around to final testing and applying all of his patches. I can't promise when I'll be able to do that, but I certainly would like to see it applied; all I definitely want to avoid is any regressions for other systems (non-MSVC w32, or non-w32). Nobody

useful bug reports (was: [Patch] Re: compile not copied? Why?)

2005-11-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Harald, * Harald Dunkel wrote on Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 06:44:12PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Please consider this thread: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-10/msg00069.html > > How is this thread related to copying a missing script? It shows that your patch is not