Re: AM_SUBST_IGNORE = AC_SUBST without Makefile variable definition

2005-10-18 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 01:24:14PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Please hold back the AM_SUBST_IGNORE until multiline substitutions in > > Automake are solved. > > I don't see why the solution to the problem of not substituting certain > variables is dependent on the problem of how to

Re: AM_SUBST_IGNORE = AC_SUBST without Makefile variable definition

2005-10-18 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:55:38PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: > I have another solution for the problem of multiline substitutions first, let me sum up the problem: If you use AC_SUBST([FOO], ["foo bar"]) in your configure.ac, then Automake traces it, and puts FOO = @FOO@ to each Make

Re: AM_SUBST_IGNORE = AC_SUBST without Makefile variable definition

2005-10-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stepan, * Stepan Kasal wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:55:38PM CEST: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:44:27PM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > > > Occasionally we want to disable automatic variable definitions > > I had been considering adding such a feature since Autoconf introduced > > multi

Re: AM_SUBST_IGNORE = AC_SUBST without Makefile variable definition

2005-10-18 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, just a very quick comment, sorry. On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:44:27PM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > Occasionally we want to disable automatic variable definitions > of AC_SUBSTitutions. I don't like the name, I think it should be AC_SUBST_*, not AM_*. I believe the macro should be d

Re: AM_SUBST_IGNORE = AC_SUBST without Makefile variable definition

2005-10-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Alexandre, * Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:44:27PM CEST: > Occasionally we want to disable automatic variable definitions > of AC_SUBSTitutions. Two cases were already hardcoded into > automake (AMDEPBACKSLASH and ANSI2KNR). I had been considering > adding such a featur