Alexandre Duret-Lutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So how about something like this instead: use [EMAIL PROTECTED]@' and expand
it to `-I.' or `-I. -I$(srcdir)' as needed?
Yes, thanks, that looks nice. For CVS coreutils/lib in-place builds
with 'configure CFLAGS=' the patch changes this:
gcc
This is the first of a series of patches all more or less related to
Fortran support in Automake.
I'd appreciate any kind of feedback, be that a rejection, missing bits,
documentation, or tests, and will happily redo.
OK to apply?
Cheers,
Ralf
* automake.in: Fortran 77 and Fortran
Hello Alexandre,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:58:07PM CEST:
RW OK to apply?
With a clone (or generalization, or whatever you see fit) of cxx2.test, yes.
Thanks. Applied as follows.
Cheers,
Ralf
* automake.in: Fortran 77 and Fortran should require
PE == Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
PE Thanks for checking it. Here's a revised patch that addresses the
PE nits you mentioned. Is it OK to install this? (Sorry, I don't recall
PE the situation for Automake.)
I like the use of two separate commands in rules.
Could you
Alexandre Duret-Lutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could you install this patch without removing the space after
-MF and -MT?
OK, thanks; done. I guess we can worry about the unnecessary spaces
later, as this isn't the only place where they're a problem.
